• Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The batteries do contain rare minerals like lithium but these can be recovered and recycled. EVs can be charged with solar, wind and other renewables even tho many places in the USA still burn coal or natural gas.

    Once you burn gasoline in your ICE vehicle then it’s gone, it turns into gasses that go into the atmosphere and can’t easily be recovered into anything of much use.

    EVs are the future and we all know it. Gasoline will continue to become more expensive and more difficult to extract.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        OK but that’s about as realistic in the next 40+ years as genetically engineered flying pigs.

        Incremental progress is good.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    People platform-independently use social media echo chambers to reinforce their own biases and suppress contrary thinking. I think it’s an attempt to find comfort zones and avoid self-questioning, which is inherently uncomfortable and involves effort.

  • eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I can tell you that keeping an existing decent ICE is better than buying a new EV. But once you have to buy a new car anyway, and an EV fits your usage pattern and operational environment there are no reasons not to buy one.

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Speaking as someone who has worked on plenty of gasoline powered cars… Duh. The most obvious waste product an internal combustion car makes other than the exhaust is the used oil. Have to do something with it. Have to make sure the engine isn’t leaking out into the environment when it’s running.

    Even if you are charging your car from a coal plant, it’s more efficient. A coal power plant runs at one speed/output all the time. Gas cars have to throttle up and down. Each gas car has to be maintained by the person owning it, while the power plant has a maintenance team and inspections.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Also to the throttling up and down, the power plant, or even a gasoline generator sitting in the car itself, will always run at peak efficiency. Even a gasoline car sitting on the highway for 4hrs isn’t running at peak efficiency and a lot of that energy is lost in heat through the transmission.

  • schnapsman@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I didn’t realise anyone still uses facebook. Like in developed countries I mean.

    • appauled@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I love in Atlanta and when I turned 21 (a couple years ago, but post 2020) I was kinda irritated because literally everything in the entire city was planned on Facebook Events, and I hated using Facebook.

      It’s overwhelmingly popular, especially in the 30+ crowd, not even restricted to your 55+. Genuinely everyone would create Facebook events (before Partiful got popular) to invite people over on a Saturday

      • OldChicoAle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Hey you keep us 30 somethings out of this. I don’t know anyone my age still on Facebook. We’re leaving Instagram too. Fuck social media and fuck platforms owned and controlled by billionaires.

        • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Amazing how an entire age group doesn’t think and act the same tho - it’s almost like they’re made up of individuals. Who would have guessed?

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Well the headline alone is misleading disinformation.

      People shouldn’t blindly trust that MIT is somehow immune from the failures of capitalist science. It’s literally the heart of the MIC. Endless bullshit coming out of there.

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Well the Misinformation Institute of Technology just cannot be trusted. It’s in the name!!

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Science back then: after long work we were able to create a vaccine, and we managed to eradicate small pox completely.

    Science now: we did a study to prove something on Facebook isn’t true.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      To be fair the scientists only invented the vaccine, and modern scientists are inventing plenty of vaccines and medical technologies today, including vaccines for infamously difficult to stop diseases like HIV.

      Eradicating smallpox was a feat of international cooperation and administration. If we put in the effort in those areas today we could eliminate measles or polio. Or in the near future we could begin the process of eliminating HIV (it would take a long time because it’s not a death sentence anymore). Now I’m mad we aren’t engaged in a global fight to eliminate HIV the way we did for smallpox.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The only “everyone” are trolls, paid or otherwise, the ignorant, and right wingnuts parroting the trolls and ignorant.

    And there are a shitload of them who all seem to want to show off that opinion.

    • mysteryhumpf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Half my family believes this it’s one of the major reason they don’t switch to EVs despite being believers of climate change.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Pretty insane how well that disinformation works. If you are worried about nickel, mangan and cobalt, just get a car with an LFP battery, which doesn’t need those heavy metals (it is based on lithium and iron phosphate). The only other critical resource in appreciable amounts is neodynium for permanent magnets. We are talking about 1-3 kg per car.

        If you think that makes EVs worse for climate or environment than ICE vehicles, think again.

    • auzy1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      And idiots who spend lots of money on overpriced ice cars to impress their mates

      That’s why they are so concerned about the resell value in a years time, because they’re not buying the car they want, only one that is fashionable

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    24 hours ago

    What we really should have done is made the Car Talk guys president. If there’s one thing I know for sure, it’s that those two would never have forced me to listen to what some MIT grad thinks.

    Absolute gold! (The hosts of Car Talk were both MIT grads)