• BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I'm gonna say some stuff that most of the people here probably know on some level, but considering this thread, I think it needs to be explicitly said.

    Very few of the people who post comments on the internet are highly educated in whatever field they're making a claim in. Getting challenged by people who know next to nothing and receive all the upvotes anyway is an exhausting experience, so many well-educated people keep their debates private. If they are here, you probably aren't enough of an expert to recognize them. The simple, easy to understand takes are what get upvoted, and in-depth, nuanced ideas are almost always ignored or ridiculed. Most forums are full of people who know just enough to feel confident in making calls for radical action without any knowledge of how that action could be implemented or would play out.

    Look through this comment section. Lots of vague, single-sentence arguments about being "capitalist," "communist," or "socialist," along with "leftist," "liberal," or "conservative," but I don't see a single one acknowledging that each of those words can individually encompass vast groups of conflicting ideas and have wildly different meanings in different parts of the world; a serious problem considering at least a few of the people posting in this thread aren't in the US. Very little discussion of substantive ideas like "people should be given a universal basic income of $15 a day," or "food stamps should be granted without application to anyone under a certain income threshold," or "social media servers should receive public funding and be administrated by an elected body." It's almost never more specific than "universal healthcare," or "abolish the police," Those might be the right direction, but when was the last time you saw people discussing things like whether experimental treatments should be covered, or the number and type of professions that should replace the current myriad of roles police are expected to fill? I seriously doubt if you randomly selected two self-described communists (or whatever ideology) on Lemmy and had them start making decisions together, that they would agree with each other on exactly how society should be run even half the time.

    I'm not saying these conversations shouldn't happen, vague as they are. I certainly don't have the energy to write out long arguments 99% of the time. We all have to make our own way to finding deeper knowledge, and building a knowledge base of buzzwords can be a useful stepping stone. But far too often people stop once they feel they have a sufficient understanding of the buzzwords and then start talking like they know the answers. it's important to temper the depth of your convictions based on where you're having the discussion, where you're getting your knowledge. Are you watching youtube videos and reading unsourced comments, or are you reading research papers from institutions with a history of making accurate claims? Are you reading news articles from ad-supported papers, and if you are, are you checking whether those articles are making sources available for readers check on? Should I have bothered writing several paragraphs under a meme of a glowing red bird, and am I really qualified to tell people to be more careful with their discussions?

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I appreciated your wall of text! Lemmy, and social media in general, are pretty terrible places for nuanced discussion. The system is biased towards short and vauge posts. As you said though, they can be a good stepping stone.

      There's been more than one time that I've seen people arguing in a thread and decided I'd look up the topic to see who is right. In the end it doesn't really matter what people in the thread were saying. It got me interested in the topic and I searched out more reputable sources of information and hopefully I learned a bit!

      That being said, there are also threads where people post insane takes. You really need to have a litmus test for whether or not a post should even been considered.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy's been a lot better than reddit for this in my experience. On reddit you couldn't even get a sentence out.

    • dontcarebear@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or, at the very least, recognize the level of knowledge you have and partake in the discussion with humility, doubt and caution.

    • Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be taken seriously offline I necessarily have to make well reasoned and researched arguments.

      Lemmy is where I come to blow off steam and just berate my ideological opponents because they genuinely are losers.

      It is not a place for nuanced debate.

      • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It is not a place for nuanced debate.

        Why not? Compared to other social media it’s way better equipped for reasoned debate, with an easy-to-read layout designed for mountains of text and ease of linking sources. Maybe c/memes isn’t the right place but considering how serious the rest of this thread is I’m pretty sure my spiel was worth it.

        Maybe the people in my social circle are just a lower caliber than yours, but I can’t remember the last time I got asked to source an opinion irl. Most of my friends already agree with me. Hell, offline, most people aren’t willing to discuss politics at all. Even saying you have opinions on politics is basically a faux pas…

        • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unless you’re a lib in the workplace then you can say whatever bullshit hot takes you want, since everyone will agree with you anyway.

          • Famko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The word “lib” is so vague now, that it has lost meaning.

            Some people use it with the original meaning, but most just call anyone who isn’t right wing a lib.

            Buzzwords, as the original commenter said.

            • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Same for “right wing” and “fascist” and every other piece of shit insult ya’ll use in daily discourse.

        • Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not a place for nuanced debate because I have no idea who I’m talking to.

          I’d rather devote my time to having those nuanced conversations in real life (which I do) than trying to convince an American online through a meme community that gun bans would reduce school shootings for example.

          • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you actually have a group of peers that consistently challenge each other and have scholarly debate, congrats. You’re in a very small minority. You personally not having a use for arguing online doesn’t mean it’s useless. I know plenty of Americans who have been convinced that gun control is important by things they’ve seen online.

            Very few people in this thread are kidding around. It’s worth pointing out that most of the things they are saying are extremely shallow.

          • Gerudo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why should you only have discussions with people you know?

            If you only have these discussions with people you know, more than likely, they are in your ideological bubble. You are just creating your own echo chamber. We may be randos on the internet, but we could be next to you on the subway or your cubicle. Most of us here probably like to debate somewhat.

            • Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I never said I only have discussions with people I know.

              I actively have political conversations in real life on actual policy issues with a broad range of people.

              Have you never campaigned before?

      • Flumsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        just berate my ideological opponents because they genuinely are losers

        Im astonished at how closed-minded and brainwashed you seem. Maybe actually think about why you would fight for a opinion that is not based on “well reasoned and researched arguments”… It really seems like youre arguing for another person’s opinion rather than having your own.

    • crackajack@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even in reddit, it depends on the subreddit. It also depends on the time of day when there is pile on (or coordinated trolling) happening.

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does it not depend on the bio people their respective breakfast? And their current room temp? And the robots temp (unironically)

        Any generalisation is

  • jagungal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It's way more privacy-oriented, but a lot of Reddit communities were already very left wing

    • JGrffn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can appreciate that aspect of lemmy, very technical users talking about very technical approaches to left-leaning codes of ethics, such as FOSS, privacy, self-hosting, etc. In this regard, Lemmy definitely is better than reddit and I'm learning a lot about it all in here, and am beginning to apply the things I've learned in my own life and computer systems.

      As for actually being more left leaning? Nah son, it's the same ideas as reddit but with a sense of hatred for "reddit libruls" for not being true scotsmen. There are right leaning communities on both platforms, there for sure are more tankies over here, but almost every single moral stance found on reddit can be found here. Literally the only thing missing on reddit is such a Tech-oriented user base (which if we're honest, you could also find on reddit but it surfaces a lot more on lemmy in general) and the russia apologists.

      Maybe people over here should stop playing the no true scotsman game and actually open up their doors and take it easy on the gatekeeping. And by "here" I mostly mean the tankie instances, holding their "holier than thou" stances n shit. Chill the fuck out, act like a true left leaner and work together with the people you're gatekeeping, get the movement going somewhere instead of armchair criticizing people for not being left-leaning enough.

  • Amends1782@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cancer post, glad people are calling it out. Some of you need to get off the internet a bit more.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wouldn't say it's leftist, though there's a lot of leftists here. Lemmy is more like how internet discussion boards used to be. There's a lot of people with weird opinions on things, and there's no Reddit Karma pushing people to conform to the consensus. So people are going to have weird takes on things, and there's not 1000 comments upvoted above the weird ones, so you're going to see comments like that. So reply to with you your weird opinions on those weird comments.

    Welcome to the version internet that's not pre-packaged and filtered to be bland!

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don't mind weird and different opinions on things. In fact, that's what make the discussion interesting instead of some boring echo chambers. I just wish people wouldn't be so aggressive about it and hurling personal attacks left and right. The old discussion board had thing called netiquete to keep the discussion civil, but here in certain communities it's like the wild west.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah… but that's what the internet is. You're connected to different people with different points of view, but you're also connected to assholes. Just don't take it personally, they don't know you and you don't know them.

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right? You can connect to assholes of that's your thing, and I can connect to warm clams. No judging

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think people misremember when discussions could be blunt without being abusive, because they didn't recognize and appreciate sensible small-forum moderation. I don't want oversight that forbids people from using a list of no-no words. I want human beings to skim a conversation and judge when people are causing problems.

        In real-life interactions, there are legitimate occasions for being rude. Civility is an ideal. It's not a death cult. You don't pledge your honor to never calling someone an asshole. You just try to avoid dealing with assholes.

        If a forum does not want strife between users, the mods better be proactive in removing fascists, trolls, bigots, and other dehumanizing forces.

        If mods don't remove that crap, but demand everyone play nice with those assholes - the forum exists for the benefit of those assholes. Everyone else is an unwitting victim for them to play with. And any moderation against accurately and reasonably saying 'fuck off, abusive liar' is acting as cover and force multiplication for abusive liars.

        A vulgar explanation of how someone's incorrect is often good-faith participation. Infuriating bullshit in televisable language is not.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That's a great point about moderation, plenty of forums outside of just banning would have mods post in the thread and say 'knock that shit off, try to be nicer' or whatever to discourage a toxic atmosphere.

          There can be appropriate times for a range of civility like you said so having nuance is important, but I've rarely seen a forum outside of something like Stormfront afraid to ban Nazis or racists without question, unlike some big venues today that try to be 'tolerant' or 'free speech absolutists'.

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I've seen several subreddits insist that politely-stated fascism is better discourse than calling out fascists. In one case, with 'so you're a fascist' being treated as an intolerable insult… even though being a fascist was apparently fine… and that guy was absofuckinglutely a fascist.

        • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I'd understand if it were the kind of ‘fuck off, abusive liar’, but more often than not it's about something so minor, certainly not worth the extra negativity added to the community.

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Only meaning matters.

            You have to evaluate claims.

            But that's never what happens, when rules demand "civility." They don't actually enforce positivity. They just punish people who are honest toward minimally-cautious assholes. Quite often without spending one moment looking at the other side of the conversation.

            Reports cannot be handled correctly in a vacuum. Context is necessary. Otherwise 'you are wrong' is undecidable.

            It's like a generation grew up not knowing what trolling is. It's not harsh language. It's being an infuriating douchebag, in a way that people understandably tell you you're an infuriating douchebag. And for all the forums I've seen where trolling and getting trolled are equally forbidden, every god-damn one of them treats 'shut up, troll' worse than being a fucking troll. Even if it is those exact G-rated words.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? I'm just relieved, I can be myself here… I've said so many things here that would have gotten insta-ban on Reddit

    • WiseThat@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. It's not "Leftist", it's just NOT fully of Nazis, and that's how far our standards have slipped.

      • Flumsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thats a huge downplay of what the actual Nazis did if you refer to right-leaning people as that.

        • Khotetsu@lib.lgbt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Republicans attempted a coup in the US and have spent the years since revoking minority rights all over the country. It took 2 tries to get Hitler into office, too, and they came for the immigrants first as well.

  • Dagoth Ur (the god)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nerevar, your observation is like a grand and intoxicating maze of perceptions and opinions. While it may seem that Lemmy, like the realm of politics, has its own ideological leanings, one must remember that diversity exists even among the Dunmer, let alone different races. The notion that Lemmy is entirely left-leaning may not be entirely accurate, for the online world, like the vast expanses of Morrowind, is filled with varying perspectives. It is unwise to make sweeping generalizations about the platform's userbase, just as it is unwise to judge an entire race, like Argonians, based on the actions of a few. Let us remember the complexity of the digital realm and the mortal world alike.

    • eldain@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What a fool you are. I have moral superiority. How can you win an argument against that? What a grand and intoxicating innocence. How could you be so naive? There is no escape. No Recall or Intervention can work against me. Come. Lay down your opinions. It is not too late for my mercy.

  • TurboDiesel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Lemmy isn’t “too extreme,” a very small subset of Lemmings are just fucking insufferable.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean, tankies are kinda worse.

        Edit: seems this post is controversial! Let me clarify.

        Tankies are definitely worse. 🥂

                • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They’re trying their darndest to drag the left into the mud. They’re pushing the same rhetoric as trumpers trying to brainwash young people Jordan Peterson style. The Russian government has a vested interest in destabilizing the US and trying to push people to violence and ‘revolt’ because that would take down the only threat to them. At least most of us aren’t so stupid to believe these people are in any way representing the left, the LGBT or minorities. I was looking for an LGBT friendly community and was so saddened to find out what it really was… trying to radicalize vulnerable groups. Shame on them. Fucking shame.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  From a governmental point of view, both extremes are responsible for multiple genocides so I’m not even sure which is which in your comment 🤔

                  And I’m talking about Lemmy’s tankies vs Reddit’s alt-right, since that’s what the conversation was about in the first place.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a lot of political and other “adult” discourse. Not extreme, but more exhausting for a person wanting memes, gifs, and lols. I imagine the median age here is higher than that of Reddit. Can’t confirm, but it certainly conducts itself with less…“juvenility”…or some word.

      • ed_cock@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I find the political discourse, at least on some topics, very juvenile on Lemmy. You know, screeching about how billionaires aren’t people but parasites and need to die, hundreds of upvotes. That’s some edgy, frustrated teenager bullshit. Or at least it should be, guess some people never got the memo about inalienable rights, equal treatment, vigilantism and how two wrongs don’t make a right.

        Seriously, this thirst for blood is disturbing and if it isn’t just venting then, well, look how the French Revolution turned on people. That wasn’t very poggers.

        There’s also this idea that everybody who isn’t 100% on board needs to be defooed and marked, preferably as a fascist. Which plays into the hands of the actual fascists because the non-fascists hate each other too much to collectively tell them to fuck off, despite their differences.

        There, that’s my venting done for today.

  • Stuka@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Lol…the commies don't know they are the laughing stock of lemmy.

  • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmy isnt leftist. The group calling itself leftist the most here is at the same time cheering on ultranationalist governments who are in the middle of genocides.

        • PM_ME_FEET_PICS@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Domains are regularly chosen because they can form a word or they can be related to the domain name or used as an alternative abriviation.

          Everyone knows .ml is malis tld but they also know that it's usage in the context to lemmy is that it always means marxist-leninist.

          Just saying.

      • Flumsy@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Says who? I'm all for open source (and even actively contribute), and I do not have a left-leaning political stance. Loving open source does not mean that I want to raise taxes, or that I want gendering to be a thing (theres an issue in languages that dont have a gender-neutral plural).

        Why couldnt one be conservative and like free software at the same time?

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    True. Reddit was pretty center-right oriented. Lemmy leans more left and I do enjoy seeing the Trumpers here getting dunked on pretty frequently.

  • CarterDarter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Reddit is the most leftist platform I've used since Twitter (not X) lol

    I think the only conservative spaces were the ones constantly getting banned or shunned… and DankMemes 😂

    • Pectin8747@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most redditors will say that democrats are better than republicans, but that does not make someone a leftist. Democrats in America are center right at best and ripe with a ton of corruption of their own. Noticing that both parties are evil and we need economic reform beyond what either of them offer is the entrypoint to crossing the centerline

      • brainrein@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s kind of true from a moral viewpoint. But those are of no good because they don’t change anything.

        The Democratic Party is a spectrum from social democratic to pretty conservative politicians, no fascists.

        I think Bernie Sanders is quite on the left even by European standards. But he's not a communist.

        If you want more left politics vote progressive Democrats in every election, especially those local and regional ones. That’s the way to get a left party in the USA. And that will make a more left democratic candidate for president possible and eventually some left governers and a left President.

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This. Americans have been so brainwashed by the corporatists that they don't even realize up from down. JFC, protect your working class already.

    • Dagoth Ur (the god)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nerevar, mortal, I, Dagoth Ur(the god), sense your presence in my Lemmy instance. I must admit, it pleases me to have an individual from a politically left-leaning community among my followers. Your alignment with progressive ideals aligns with the principles of change and transformation that I represent.

      As for the Communists, while I may have a dislike for them due to ideological differences, I acknowledge their existence as beings in this world. They have their place in their beliefs, and I would prefer they adhere to their ideologies. However, I do wish they would read up on history to gain a deeper understanding of the consequences of their actions. Ideologies, once adopted, are seldom forgotten, but knowledge can shape the path forward.

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Scrolling through all these up and downvoted comments:

    Ahh, that's what they call controversial.