Transcript

Title text: This is how you all fucking sound

[A smug tech bro wearing a sideways cap, watch, chain around his neck stands in front of a data center by a lake with dead fish. A smoke stack blows pollution into the air]

Tech bro: AI is already here, there’s no going back.

[A smug man in a suit with cigarette in hand stands in a restaurant while two disgruntled diners cough from the smoke]

Suit: Smoking indoors is already here, there’s no going back.

[A smug man in a top hat and suit stands in a factory with two sad and dirty children]

Hat: Child labor is already here, there’s no going back.

[A smug plantation owner stands in front of a field with with two angry slaves]

Plantation owner: The Atlantic Slave trade is already here, there’s no going back.

Still Vreni on Bluesky

  • ninjabard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The AI “arms race” as you put it is absolutely capitalism at its core. Replace humans with shitty robots so they don’t have to continue paying wages to actual humans. Its just the the first person that makes it work will be able to set the rules for the ones that follow. Getting paid for those rules and making further entrenched in capitalism.

    • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      The frustrating part is that we could be on the precipice of an amazing time. We could be in a space where it makes sense to dump tons of resources into rapidly progressing automation because it would enable people to finally stop doing tedious labor.

      But a combination of our inability to demand collective ownership of these systems and a similar disdain for social welfare means the prospect is instead terrifying. We need to continue to allow people to work cash registers for well below livable wages because otherwise they’ll starve.

      There is an alternate reality where the end result of AI is that people are just free to live how they want, to socialize, to explore art and novel ideas within their passion, engage in social supports, etc. but instead we will continue to prop up the need for mind numbing and tedious labor out of a fear of homelessness because collectivism is scary and bad

      • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I mean we passed that point decades ago, im not an expert but im pretty sure it’s literally been decades since we produced enough food for everyone on the planet to be obese and at least in the US I believe we have more empty houses than individual homeless people. AI overinvestment is another step in the wrong direction but it’s not the cause of any of our current problems.

      • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The frustrating part is that we could be on the precipice of an amazing time.

        Either the collapse of civilization or a literal uprising.

      • auntieclokwise@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I think we may very well be on the precipice of the world you imagine, or something like it. But the old world dies hard and takes effort to abolish. We didn’t get where we are because we were given what we have - we fought for it. I think we’re seeing the beginning stages of people demanding that the benefits of AI and automation flow to them, rather than to just the elite. Won’t be without pain, but I think we get there. Partly because we kind of have to. People get over their fear of socialism and collectivism really fast when they get desperate yet there’s people making huge piles of money off the automation that stole their job. I can’t say for sure what the future looks like, but I don’t think we stay locked here forever. To think so is to look at the situation during the first gilded age and say nothing can change. Well, it did and we got the progressive age.

      • fizzle@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        We could be in a space where it makes sense to dump tons of resources into rapidly progressing automation because it would enable people to finally stop doing tedious labor.

        I dont think this is true.

        Space mining is only for resources to use in space. The economics of transporting resources back to earth will never stack up.

        I dont think any significant number of humans will spend any amount of time in space in any practical time scale.

        • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I don’t mean people actually being in space. Perhaps a better word choice would be place, eg “we could be in a place where…”

        • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I think we could be seeing a shift in the economics if humans can reliably live off world anyway.

          I think NASAs SR-1 can show a reliable link to mars via what amounts to automated space trucks, but really only time will tell if we can kick off a new age of humanity or just keep letting neo-aristocrats take over again and again.

          • fizzle@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Nah.

            It would be infinitely better to go live in a box in your back yard for several years. At least that way you avoid the chronic health issues arising from “living off world”.

            Even with a lot of yet-to-be-theorised physics, I just cant see the motivation for humans to leave earth in significant numbers.

            IMO space will be populated almost exclusively by machines.

            • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              Maybe that’s the end use for AI.

              Edit: i think of space as like this infinite ocean depth. There is eventually gonna be like this massive pocket of new world down there, but until there is, there just isn’t any reason to go ourselves unless you’re one of those types of people.

              I’d also like to invoke the cautions of 2001 Space Odyssey as food for thought

              • fizzle@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Thats kinda of my point though, im predicting that there will never be a new world, either under the ocean or “off world”.

                Its a fascinating concept, and I do love sci fi, but in reality it just doesn’t seem plausible.

      • NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I don’t think this is quite how the world works. The reason people need to work to survive is because we can’t survive if everyone stopped working. We have to make people work under threat of homelessness because if we didn’t there is too great a risk they wouldn’t work at all and that would eventually mean the collapse of society. How many people would quit their job tomorrow if they won the lottery? Sure some would find work doing something they preferred, but not all of them, and often the thing they prefer doing is not the job that actually needs doing the most. If it’s something they even are good at. Loads of people would love to be an actor, but how many actually have both the talent and the skills needed to do that?

        In a society where most people actually don’t need to work because most work can be handled by machines without significant negative consequences things would change to be very different. People like to think rich people or politicians or kings control the world by themselves but the reality is there are always limits on what they can actually do. If you dick around too much even in an absolute monarchy you will be overthrown one way or another. Typically by your own military, underlings, or family, sometimes by revolution or insurrection. The same thing applies today to liberal democracy. In fact it applies even more so. Anyone who tried to kill off the working class as a whole would find themselves very quickly dead or dethroned one way or another.

        • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          We have to make people work under threat of homelessness because if we didn’t there is too great a risk they wouldn’t work at all and that would eventually mean the collapse of society

          No, people want to work. Look at Wikipedia, SCP, Minecraft, all those job simulator games, Linux, the Fediverse. The drive to create something that benefits people is fundamental to the human experience.

    • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The thing, western governments fear is AI-powered terminators. They want the tech first, so they can win the war when someone attacks them. That is the arms race part.

      The unemployment explosion is obviously also happening. But that’s actually a pretty good thing in the long run as a society with 90% unemployment and the need to work to live is absolutely unsustainable. AI will basically force the end of capitalism by increasing the system’s volatility until it adapts.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        LLMs will never be able to be terminators. This is just an expensive exercise in futility.

        • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I thought, LLMs would never become able to write code. And now, I use Claude Code as the always available senior on coke.
          LLMs have a reliability problem. If that gets solved somehow, they can actually drive a worker bot - or a terminator.

          And the big money pits also don’t only do LLMs. Those just get all the press because they are usable by normal users right now. Of course, some of those money pits are just investor scams. It’s a fully corrupted society after all.

          • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            The “reliability problem” is a fundamental part of how they work. There is no solving it.

            BTW, I wish you luck debugging all that vibe code when it stops working. Seriously.

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The thing, western governments fear is AI-powered terminators. They want the tech first, so they can win the war when someone attacks them. That is the arms race part.

        I think you’re right that this is what they are thinking, but they are being idiots.

        My bash script terminators will easily destroy any AI terminators.

        My bash scripts don’t hallucinate, and aren’t so bloated that they require an always-available link to a data center.

        What we call “AI” today is not remotely close to being a good combat-ready solution.

        The winners of any coming AI war won’t win it with the bullshit slop-peddling tools being pushed by con artists, today.