• mke_geek@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everything you said is a lie. There’s no exploitation. Paying rent is trading money for a service.

    • CaptFeather@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      What service do landlords offer? Every property I’ve ever rented myself or seen from my friends is falling apart and shitty for an insane amount of money each month. If landlords charged half as much as they do maybe you’d have a leg to stand on.

        • instamat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          No they don’t, they charge people to live in property that they own. That’s not “providing” housing, that’s profiting off of someone else’s need.

          • mke_geek@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            1 year ago

            Rental property owners charge for the service of providing housing. Home Depot charges for the service of renting their tools. The bouncy house places charge for the service of renting their bouncy houses.

            • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              shelter is a human necessity. It is wrong to hoard shelter while there are people who have none.

              • mke_geek@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                Rental property owners don’t hoard shelter. The whole point is to provide housing to individuals and families.

                • pivot_root@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  hoard (verb.)
                  To accumulate money, food, or the like, in a hidden or carefully guarded place for preservation, future use, etc.

                  Rental property owners don’t hoard shelter.

                  I might be inclined to agree with you if landlords took out the locks and made those empty rental properties into interim homeless shelters, but we both know they would never do it.

                  • mke_geek@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Rental properties aren’t hidden. There’s no cloak of invisibility spell surrounding them. So your definition doesn’t apply.

                    Rental properties aren’t empty except during renovation or between tenants. So your second assertion also doesn’t apply.

                • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  providing and selling are 2 different things (renting is just selling the limited use of something)

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You aren’t doing yourself any favors bringing home depot into this, the owners are also greedy cunts.

              There’s also a huge difference between something that protects you from the elements and renting a tool. There is no fundamental need for a tool, there is a fundamental need for shelter.

              With how invested you are on your side, I wouldn’t be surprised to see you admit that you’re a landlord.

              • mke_geek@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Home Depot is just one example. Any other example works.

                People can grow their own food but choose to use the grocery store. The grocery store charges more for the food than they pay for it, because they’re providing a service.

                Pharmacies sell medication and people buy from them. They are providing a service of having all the medication in one place.

                People trade money for goods OR services. That’s how the economy operates.

        • GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So they’re giving the housing to those in need for free, or at the very least at cost? That would be “providing” housing.

          • mke_geek@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not the definition in the slightest. You don’t seem to have an understanding of what a landlord does.

                • pivot_root@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  A landlord takes property off the market and provides housing that costs more than mortgage payments.

                  FTFY

                  • mke_geek@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    11
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    A landlord does not take housing off the market. Rental housing is still on the market for families to live in.

                    Rent costs more than mortgage payments because it includes the payment for services to the owner. If you work a job you expect to get paid for your work and so does the landlord.

                • Radioactive Radio@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They buy all the houses and put them up on a subscription service that costs more than what the person would’ve paid for it and keep increasing the prices every month.

                  • mke_geek@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    When someone is on a lease, the rent amount cannot increase during the lease period. At the end of the lease period, the person is free to move somewhere else.

                • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If the mortgage payment is the SAME or MORE as the rent, you aren’t providing shit.

                  • mke_geek@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That’s incorrect. Houses need maintenance. They are not self healing. Things break, items need replacing, grass needs to be cut, light bulbs need to be changed, etc. Tenants also need to be managed.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ew. What a gross little parasite they are… Like watching a leech suck the blood out of a person and saying at least it lowers their blood pressure…

        They are my first block on Lemmy just cause they are clearly mentally deranged

    • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      What service? They own something I need to live. Landlording is inherintly exploitative, there is really no way I can think of that renting out a property is ethical.

      Before you say no I can’t live in a tent or my car that’s a crime. Sure technically I could but I wouldn’t be able to park or put up a tent without tresspassing or violating a no parking order, also not allowed to live in a caravan park either.

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        They provide a place to live that you can move into almost immediately with little upfront money, and with no worry about any maintenance costs that are associated with owning a property.

        It’s very useful for social mobility as it allows people to move around for work relatively easy if they plan on relocating, especially when they’re young.

        Buying a property not only takes a sizeable upfront amount of capital but it’s also a very slow process. I think it took 6 or 7 months for us to go from putting an offer in to getting the keys.

        That’s the service and that’s why a rental market is important. I’m not defending scrupulous landlords here, they’re 100% an issue and there definitely needs to be changes to address that.

        • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Problem is that the upfront cost for renting is still steep. One months rent as a deposit (which 9/10 you won’t even get back even if you left the property pristine) on top of your first months rent is quite expensive, and most mortgage payments people make are also usually cheaper than what they would pay renting but they do not have the startup capital to even get on the ladder.

          you also have to ask permission to even decorate the place and more than likely if you do you then have to put it back the way it was. So you are stuck with lovely magnolia walls, and if you want to redo the bathroom you best be careful that the landlord doesn’t decide your renovations increased the value and charge you more rent because of it.

          Of the people I know who rent, which is basically everyone in my age bracket, they want to own a property but cannot afford to it’s a massive issue.

          I agree buying properties takes ages I cannot dispute that, and you can still get screwed by unscrupulous sellers.

          The place I live now is the best rented property I have and that is only because the estate agents actually listen to me and fix issues promptly. Which as far as I am concerned is the bare minimum which most just don’t do, you also have no recourse because the landlord has way more power over you.

          Don’t get me started on flat inspections every 3 months is a piss take.

      • mke_geek@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, owning rental property is not exploitative. It gives people a choice of where to live. No one rental property is required for anyone to live – there’s millions of choices in the United States alone for places to live.

        And yes, camping is legal. People camp every single day in the United States. And yes, people own RVs. They live in them and travel around the country. This is legal. Both of these give even more options for places to stay.

        • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t though you get a property you don’t own and you enrich someone else instead of making enough money to actually own a property which you won’t be able to afford anyway

          Good for the USA I suppose not for me though, and that falls apart if the person wants to live in or near a city

          • mke_geek@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Paying rent is trading money for a service.

            Owning a property means shelling out money, sometimes unexpectedly. The furnace goes out in the middle of winter? Better fix that quick. Don’t have the money? Let it get to freezing now your pipes burst and that’s just thousands of dollars more to spend on top of the thousands of dollars to replace the furnace.

            • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              If I owned the property I could get the boiler fixed faster but seeing now I have to wait on the landlord and hope he understands the urgency, or I fix his property and good luck for me getting that money reimbursed.