I mean, the evidence is pretty solid. She gets arrested, the account remains active. She is at a party, the account is actively moderating. She is at home with no known appointments, the account is silent.
The broader premise, that the evidence that it is her is very circumstantial and coincidental is overvalued and that similar evidence that disproves it’s her is ignored is pretty compelling.
As far as I know that was debunked. The account was active when Maxwell definitely couldn’t have been. See also: https://coagulopath.com/ghislaine-maxwell-does-not-have-a-secret-reddit-account/
What do you actually agree with in that article? Not philosophically. specifically about how they detect and evaluate the evidence they present.
I mean, the evidence is pretty solid. She gets arrested, the account remains active. She is at a party, the account is actively moderating. She is at home with no known appointments, the account is silent.
The broader premise, that the evidence that it is her is very circumstantial and coincidental is overvalued and that similar evidence that disproves it’s her is ignored is pretty compelling.