Transcript
Title text: This is how you all fucking sound
[A smug tech bro wearing a sideways cap, watch, chain around his neck stands in front of a data center by a lake with dead fish. A smoke stack blows pollution into the air]
Tech bro: AI is already here, there’s no going back.
[A smug man in a suit with cigarette in hand stands in a restaurant while two disgruntled diners cough from the smoke]
Suit: Smoking indoors is already here, there’s no going back.
[A smug man in a top hat and suit stands in a factory with two sad and dirty children]
Hat: Child labor is already here, there’s no going back.
[A smug plantation owner stands in front of a field with with two angry slaves]
Plantation owner: The Atlantic Slave trade is already here, there’s no going back.


Now people watch their phone while eating and the public discourse is filled with their algorithm infused opinions.
Globalisation took care of the rest. Children still work, slaves still exist, but not visible to us.
AI can be hidden but not prevented.
The difference between laws and physically changing the world.
I have no idea what you’re talking about.
Vaccines change the world and prevent the origin of the illness. They work.
To prevent AI, laws are needed, like they are needed to end slavery. Laws don’t change the origin, just the opportunities. So if somebody finds a new opportunity, that opportunity is used.
In theory, it’s possible to prohibit AI all over the world. But like slavery, people will find ways to get it anyway.
People still get measles. Today.
Also, vaccines don’t work if no one takes them. If someone doesn’t want to, you would have to limit their opportunities to get them to.
They work for those who take them. That’s a good start.
Yeah, and banning AI would fix a lot of things, actually. That’s a pretty bad start for AI.