Here we go again…

  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No… it's literally the first sentence I quoted.

    What you don't seem to understand is that the disposition to handled the drugs badly is genetic and comorbidity = related to the previous ailment.

    Want to actually complete a thought when you respond? Or just continue claiming that I missed something?

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So if there's a normal rate of substance abuse in any given population… Let's for shits and giggles say that 1% of all people have some form of substance abuse problems…

        But schizophrenic people are more susceptible to it substance abuse increasing their volatility/making them more violent than the normal population of substance abusers… How is this not a schizophrenic-based problem? It should be even more predominant because the population of Schizophrenic people vs normal population that needs to be medicated (unlike the general population at large)…

        Edit: for clarity

        Schizophrenic population has greater rates of substance use due to medications. Schizophrenic populations are less favorable by genetics to react to medications.

        These two facts (supported by previous study linked), mean that the population is more risky for the behavior. Regardless is the Schizophrenia itself not being the direct problem… it's certainly a meaningful contributor.