Do you agree? If not, what's your counter arguments?

  • kevin@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really the only thing that I miss on Linux is creative cloud stuff. Yeah, gimp and inkscape cover 80% of the functionality of PS and Illustrator right out of the gate, and I bet I could get to 90% if I sank a bunch of hours into learning the differences. Which is amazing for open source software.

    But there's a gap when you have a team of dedicated and highly paid developers and hordes of creatives testing everything out and demanding progress that's going to be hard to overcome.

    • atomkarinca@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      sometimes that's right, but other times it fires back. like in autodesk software, it turns into a money making machine. because they're the industry standard for more than a decade now, they just pump out new version every year with barely any changes and deliberately not forward compatible. so you just pay more every month, because everything is subscription based now.

      • kevin@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That's fair. Another example of what you describe that I'm more familiar with is Epic (medical records software). My hypothesis is that the differences that matter are:

        1. Cost of switching is higher and/or
        2. The people making the decision (business manager, hospital admin) are farther from the actual users of the software.

        Could be lots of other reasons too, but these are the ones that jump out at me.