• woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not android

      Which part of "If Flatpak adopts parts of Android’s security system" don't you understand? Do you need help with conditionals in the English language?

      • AProfessional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Flatpak already has an established security model.

        Your statement is pointless and you are rude.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Flatpak already has an established security model.

          You are not a Flatpak core developer, so you have absolutely no idea whether they decide if different applications from the same vendor will at some point be allowed to access each others data.

          Your statement is pointless

          It's not pointless to think about possible future decisions a crucial piece of software might have to make. I also replied to a question from OP, so it's not your decision what is pointless and what isn't anyway.

          and you are rude.

          If you think that being an uninvited "But actually" comment isn't rude, you have a skewed sense of reality. I was answering a question from OP, not yours. You're the one who engaged with that attitude. Look in the mirror before making accusations.

          Edit: Blocking you now. Not engaging with a brat any longer.