Arch package spliting is not as hard as Debian/Fedora.
But IMO, it’s because Fedora uses BTRFS with compression enabled.
Arch package spliting is not as hard as Debian/Fedora.
But IMO, it’s because Fedora uses BTRFS with compression enabled.
some devs don’t want to debug last arch/ubuntu broken setup.
We use Puppet to manage Linux and Windows servers + Linux, Mac and Windows client (drives, registry/defaults/dconf, …). A package manager can’t handle this properly ;)
On the other hand X11 is missing an important feature: security
Fuck You NVIDIA
How is this article about desktop effects?
Ubuntu, then Debian on my University computers, broken every weeks with dpkg killed while updating (students don’t care properly shutting down computers).
Since we migrated to Silverblue, it just works. We can downgrade the system at any point in time, even previous release. Apps can be individually downgraded, locked at any point in history. Totally not doable with a traditional package manager.
Written by an idiot who never contributed to free software.
The code is available as git, you just don’t have access to src.rpm.
Looks bad in comparison with Silverblue where I can pin many previous version. Thanks to OSTree, you can downgrade to any point in the history or even switch back to an older release.
Looks you're talking about flathub, not flatpak…
Nightmare GNOME screenshot
It does the update here, on Fedora
It does background updates for flatpak. For system, just move to Silverblue.
Silverblue here with automatic updates enabled, I do not care anymore, it just works.
It’s FUD, redhat is a major contributor paying developers. It’s a sad news but it’s crazy to say redhat just profits free contributors.
what are flathub issues? IMO it’s easier than putting your app in Debian…