• Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    So nothing related to earth sciences at all… Thanks! I'll trust the people who are actually specialized scientists that are quoted in the article then.

    • kibiz0r@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The scientists didn't pick the headline. An editor – who I assure you knows nothing about Earth sciences – picked it, for maximum clickbait.

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I read the article. Anyone who just reads headlines these days are more or less dumb. You should know I read it since I could tell you that scientists were quoted in the article… But I guess that went over your head. The point is ultimately that youtube shorts isn't an accurate rebuttal to anything unless the person in the video is a direct source… And in this case you've validated they're not.

        • kibiz0r@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure thing homie. I just wanted to clear up a common misconception. But if you wanna take a stand about properly citing first-party sources in memes@lemmy.ml, then you do you I guess.

          • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            See… if you actually read my comment. It was a complaint that people upvoted a tiktok like video rather than an actual article that contained proper resources. Pointing out that people would rather prefer a bubbly personality rather than actually understanding it.

            But you know… you do you I guess.