based


image:

screenshot of a Tweet from Running With Scissors reading

“We’ve been told our games are too expensive in some countries but we’ve been using Steam’s recommended pricing for a while. We trust Valve enough to not change this. If our games are still too expensive for you, you can pirate them until you have enough to support us.”

  • Naatan@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m getting old … what does this mean and why is it objectionable? Google suggests it means they have strong character, which seems like a fair assessment.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      To a zoomer, based is the opposite of cringe (I’m told). This is the first time I’ve seen it mentioned in regards to alt-right, that sounds like they happened to be alt-right zoomers.

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, it’s not the “opposite of cringe” and it’s not an alt-right dog whistle. It just means the person or group is willing to do the right thing, above politics or greed. It’s more comparable to Giga Chad, but it’s more accurate to say that Giga Chad when used in memes is the representation of a based individual.

        Also, “alt-right” is a dog whistle for “white supremacist”, invented by a white supremacist to soften the language. Stop using it. Just call them white supremacists or fascists.

        • cobra89@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          My understanding of “based” from years and years ago was that it was used as an exclamation when people essentially weren’t afraid to speak their minds even if they’re likely to get shit for said opinion.

          That’s why it’s gotten associated with the alt-right because it was usually bigoted douchebags saying bigoted shit that other bigots would then respond “based” to. I feel like the terminology was associated with 4chan in its early usage and spread to reddit.

          I believe your definition that is popular with Gen Z is a newer development.

    • Rentlar@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      What I understand this originates from is “not based on anything”, so essentially bucking the trend or the norm. Doing things not because something or someone told them.

      It’s 4chan type of language, itself an alt-right cesspool.

      • Naatan@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gotcha… From reading all the responses, it sounds like the word and meaning itself isn’t really objectionable, it’s more the people that use it. Which isn’t something a search engine tells you… 😅

        • blindsight@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s gone mainstream. I hear it in high schools all the time from many different students. I think it’s pretty unobjectionable.

    • mothersprotege@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve long regarded it as a red flag, since the first people I encountered using it were alt-right dipshits. Subsequently it seems to have been adopted wholesale, and I get the impression that most people don’t see it as politically charged.

        • Crotaro@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          My man, that’s so not funky of you! If you skedaddle into this far out place called internet, you have to expect to come across new terms that are slammin and radical to some people. Instead of giving them hairy eyeballs and going “No can do”, how about you say “Word, brother”? Every generation invents its own gnarly slang and that’s pretty fly, actually. Like, what makes your slang groovy and theirs bogus?

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Words have meaning, and that meaning is defined by common understanding. If a significant percentage of the population does not know what a word means, (and I mean a significant percentage not just some people) then it’s fair to say the word is essentially nonsense.

          The problem is sometimes people pick a word and then decide on its meaning but then neglect to inform the rest of the human population - see Woke. That’s not how language works, it’s about mutual acceptance the particular sound or set of sounds means a particular idea or concept or thing. If that mutual acceptance is not there, then it is not a word.

          • noodlejetski@geddit.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            see Woke

            it’s been coined by the Black community, essentially meaning being aware of, and alert to, the systematic injustice against them. there you go.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There are many people who would disagree that that is its meaning, and that’s the problem. There is no completely defined meaning for these words, they mean different things to different people so when you say the word I don’t know what meaning is supposed to be interpreted.

          • hikaru755@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s how literally all language change happens? People just start using words differently or use new words, it slowly spreads, until a majority is using it. You can either embrace it and be happy you get new tools to express yourself with, or reenact the “old man yells at clouds” meme and be grumpy. I know which one I’ll choose.

          • Serdan@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Humanity is not a hive mind. We can’t just inform everyone instantly.

          • blindsight@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What you’re missing is that language is often used differently in subculture groups and other niches. Language frequently changes meaning depending on context, and that’s how it’s supposed to work.

            Language never has been and never will be static. Shared slang is a very important part of signaling that you are part of an “in group”, and it will always change rapidly, compared to language in more common usage.

            Related: trans-phobic signaling that “they/them” should be used exclusively singularly as a plural, despite its common use as a gender neutral pronoun for centuries.

            • EnderofGames@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              exclusively singularly

              I think you mean… plurally?

              Long before I had any knowledge of transgender or even transexuality, I knew to use they/them when gender was unknown. I agree that the “singular they” is long accepted, correct, common English.

      • bundes_sheep@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I figure people need to pick up on new slang or risk becoming the old man or woman that yells at kids to get off their lawn one day.

      • Naatan@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol… it definitely reminds you of how old you’re getting. But I’m sure the generations preceding ours felt the same.