do some research or something jesus lmao. Linux servers, on average, are much higher profile entities to target, typically has more eyes watching them for problems, and technically literate people administrating them. meanwhile your typical windows machine is used by non technical, every day users who do very little proper security practices and threat mitigations.
you get a better ROI targeting windows users than you do, Linux users. it’s really not difficult to understand
this owes to the fact that windows simply has exponentially more users and is therefore more valuable to target.
this idea lies on a complete misunderstanding. Linux, without extensive hardening efforts, is ootb much more insecure than either Windows or macos
what do you mean you claim “more secure” here? secure in comparison to what, exactly?
aosp and android aren’t necessarily one in the same.
just change it yourself
less crashes, higher average fps, behaves with alt+tab better, etc. everything works ✨better✨
you’re explanation makes sense and yet, gaming still works better on kde. it’s a known reality.
I would extend this Nobara recommendation from “for gaming” to “for anyone with Nvidia graphics”
never in my years of using Linux have I ever thought that it was rendered clearer. let’s be honest with ourselves, no need to lie.
homophobic
this is so much more wlrk
ironically that’s literally what x11 is made for.
fedora’s Nvidia support is leagues ahead of anything debian based in my experience. that’s not to mention debians insanely out-dated package repo.
the argument that Linux is less popular therefore less targeted is both misguided and a security through obscurity based argument. Linux is the most used server operating system and servers are targeted more than any individual and those server based malware often works on desktop versions as well.
other countries rely on the US because the US uses military intervention and economic sanctions to ensure everyone has to rely on them. this is not difficult to understand