wholookshere

no one said anything about legality.

but that this points known hackers at your door.

“we” as in those who demand better.

not we as in those who don’t care.

I never said you have to do something. just that things don’t get better that way…

I also loved the moved goal posts of “demanding you do something” to “implying”.

what makes you think I haven’t been?

if we don’t band together to demand it, what will actually change?

also please quote where I demanded anything of anyone here.

the only way things improve is we start demanding better.

lying down won’t do a thing

it always interesting to people who say ‘with current levels of funding’.

because taxes should be going to give you a closer train stop…

I think it’s the contradiction of trying to fight censor ship while also praising the US government, who is in a stream of heavy censorship. just look at that 60 min episode.

yes?

I’m sure they have enough content in the data store.

bush era regulations aren’t foreigners…

here’s the thing with Putin, he didn’t invent the flames, he just stoked them. The tea party was always this.

your quick to blame current problems on foreigners, while ignoring that those people came to the us BECAUSE of its existing imperialistic politics.

They’re at best a symptom of a larger problem.

ignoring the decades of previous history of home made American imperialism.

Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam,…

forgive my snarkiness. its usually the quickest way to this realization.

what has been published by deep seek is the music, not the software, the music.

can you show me the actual source code?

the human readable code, not the weights.

deleted by creator

no,

your changing the definition of open source software. which has been around a lot longer than AI has.

source code is what defines open source.

what deepseek has is open weights. they publish the results of their learning only. not the source that produced it.

I really wish there was one better than Gramerly and now this…