It began as a side project in which the three co-founders built their first video surveillance cameras by hand around Langley’s dining room table. When a DeKalb County detective told Langley that his camera product had helped with solving a home break-in, Langley called the two other co-founders and told them to quit their jobs.

That reads exactly like those made up masturbatory LinkedIn anecdotes. I guarantee that this “Langley” guy is the one that edited the page to put it there.

You win the ragebait thread 🏆

Also, the AI-Windows could be upsold as a luxury, which means you can charge more for AI-11.

… If people were willing to pay for it, which is a tiny percentage of the small percentage of people that want AI on their windows. Even the people that are all in on chatgpt will very rarely accept paying a cent for it (and it must be a bargain considering that openAI said a few months ago that the average premium plan is a net loss for them due to the server costs)

The way things have been going it’s more likely that the AI-free version will be the upsold luxury

You’re being way too generous with him if you assume that

• he’s self aware about his (lack of) sex skills
• he actually cares about pleasing women

Copyright laws are dumb and need to be changed.

And I also think that the laws that currently exist should apply to openAI. I don’t see any contradiction there.

The current system where regular people can get screwed over for torrenting movies but techno-oligarch wannabes are free to ignore the law is the absolute worst of both worlds.