They’re semantically different for PATCH requests. The first does nothing, the second should unset the name field.

I’m finally coming around to this after decades of being steered away from it by The Simpsons (https://youtu.be/CQod276-7Mo?si=F5_Suzq41QAK_Wtg).

But they’re not even that passionate about this. Shitty game companies continue to be rewarded by players.

Guess they need to watch food network a second time.

Panko bread dough is placed between two metal surfaces, and is cooked by running an electric current through it. This avoids any crust forming, causing it to be very uniform.

I imagine you could do the same with brownies.

No, sorry. Ethically, this technology can only be used for torture.

Works even better in Ruby, as the code as given is valid, you just need to monkey patch length:

#!/usr/bin/env ruby

module DayLength
  def length
    if ["Sunday", "Monday", "Tuesday", "Wednesday", "Thursday", "Friday", "Saturday"].include? self
      "24 hours"
    else
      super
    end
  end
end

class String
  prepend DayLength
end

day = "Monday"

x = day.length

print(x)

It could be Ruby; puts is more common, but there is a print. With some silly context, the answer could even be correct:

#!/usr/bin/env ruby

module DayLength
  def length
    if ["Sunday", "Monday", "Tuesday", "Wednesday", "Thursday", "Friday", "Saturday"].include? self
      "24 hours"
    else
      super
    end
  end
end

class String
  prepend DayLength
end

day = "Monday"

x = day.length

print(x)

I’m sorry to hear that. I think at one point in my past, about half my job was tracking down nil dereference errors in Ruby. And probably a quarter was writing tests for things a good type system would catch at compile time.

I’m waiting for Outlook (Taylor’s Version).

The only selling point of blockchain is that it’s trustless. This becomes a less-useful property when it comes to things in the real world, as you tend to need to trust at least one party.

For example, anything they achieved there with blockchain, they could have achieved with a simple government-run web service and a traditional database.

That is not a use for blockchain.

Say I want to say that I created an image. I could post that image’s hash to a block chain, and point to it as something anyone can check.

But you already have to trust me for that to be valuable. So I can just host that hash in any of a myriad of conventional methods that are simpler, more performant, and less wasteful.

I’m not sure we even bother to suggest they don’t use them on civilians.

Et tu Brute?

By vertical tabs do you mean tabs on the side instead of the top? If so, check out the tree-style tabs extension, it’s great.

Fwiw, I’ve been playing mostly fine on my Linux desktop. One crash, but otherwise no issues.

You need an account and to be logged in to see comments now.

Hear me out: part of me welcomes that.

Currently, most websites are awful to browse, and a few are not. If we switch to a world where most are inaccessible to me, and a few are nice, then I’ll spend less time being frustrated by cookie popups and the like.

Like, if a site’s going to be terrible, I almost prefer it just not let me in at all.

Not really, no. Who’s going to honor the deed? There’s your central authority that can control it.

I hate to break it to you, but hot dogs and tacos are the same.

https://cuberule.com/