That is odd. It’s not what I see:
That is odd. It’s not what I see:
A very poor Lemmy article headline. The linked article says “alleged” and clearly there were multiple factors involved.
It’s a PR issue not a legal one.
Any USB-C headphones work.
This report is from 2016. It’s mainly of historical interest.
This doesn’t sound like a serious problem for a company like Google. They can afford to solve it by brute force — just put a Wi-Fi hotspot in every single room.
Strange when the party receiving the “commission” gets to dictate the terms of that commission.
I recommended Brother laser printers to some older relatives and this happened. The printers required a power reset every few days.
You never ask them if it’s plugged in. You tell them to unplug it for 10 seconds.
I don’t know. Microsoft across their product lines comes off as desperate for engagement. They probably don’t even care what option you choose as long as you keep their app running a little longer.
Since it’s an Air Force base it could also be used as an airport for tech billionaires’ private jets.
The Register likes to use old fashioned British slang and cheeky headlines that punters might find humorous.
Brave is a nice browser but I’m not going to trust crypto bros with my privacy.
Or they changed the headline and due to caches CDNs or other reasons you didn’t get the newer one.
archive.today has your original headline cached.
Thanks for posting. While it’s a needlessly provocative headline, if that’s what the article headline was, then that is what the Lemmy one should be.