It was definitely togs in Qld when I was growing up. Might be the old potato cake/scallop debate all over again.
It was definitely togs in Qld when I was growing up. Might be the old potato cake/scallop debate all over again.
The only thing we’re voting on is the change to the constitution. The change wording has been supplied.
The actual makeup and operation of the voice is not up for voting. There have been very in-depth design documents, such as I posted in the other thread: https://voice.gov.au/resources/indigenous-voice-co-design-process-final-report
Having read a 270 page report of how the organisation is structured and how it will operate, does that make you more inclined to vote yes? Is it enough detail for you?
Personally I don’t think the detail will convince anyone. I think it’s like the gay marriage survey - someone originally deciding to vote no on that, but then reading the actual legislative requirements and then changing their mind to yes. I just don’t think that’s a common occurrence.
Another one in FNQ that isn’t getting much media coverage too https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/article/2024/jun/29/man-allegedly-stabbed-woman-to-death-before-attempting-carjack-on-major-queensland-highway
Im sure both of these will go on a list somewhere and we’ll continue to ask “what can we do?”