Traditionally, no. Under this new umbrella term, anything can count if you squint your eyes right.

It certainly makes it hard for me, as a fan of actual games like Rogue, to find said games when the genre is so flooded with literally every other game out there.

That’s the weird thing is that what people call a “roguelike” now is just what pretty much every game was back in the day.

Sorry to go on a well-trodden tangent, but it really is unfortunate how diluted the term “roguelike” has become.

I had it running on Windows (no container) a while back. Wasn’t particularly difficult at that time, at least.

Can’t give any advice here though, since all we’ve been given to work with is an OS.

100%. To be honest I don’t even use this “trick” anymore myself because like 60% of the links are inaccessible now.

It’s incredibly sad that they destroyed such a great resource, that place was like the Wikipedia of opinions.

I feel like Aaron 100% would have backed Lemmy.

(Edit: Not that I or anyone can speak for him, obviously.)

For the record, the real trick is to add “site:reddit.com”. But as the site decays over time that will sadly become less useful.

For the record - I know, lol. But thank you!

Edit: Ooooh, the person I was replying to edited their comment. I see where the confusion came from now haha.

“Cease and desist”?

Tbf it probably depends what you would say counts as a “paradigm shift”, but either way, yours is for sure a fair opinion.

You mean they aren’t General Artificial Intelligence. They definitely are AI.

That said, I do think we’re like 2 or 3 paradigm shifts away from General AI.

Haha well that’s uhh…

Ngl that’s a interesting idea. Would definitely want it running locally, though.

I think I’d be okay up until you pulled intellisense, at which point I would literally deflate like a balloon.

Just went to look for it, and looks like they were all deleted from that post after I called it out, thankfully.

Saw a post here on Lemmy the other day where the replies were very obviously from ChatGPT. That’s when I knew the internet was over.

Regarding the TTS specifically, I remember looking into TorToiSeTTS back when this stuff was first coming out. You can generate ElevenLabs quality audio with it, but it’s insanely slow. In fact, when I was looking into it, it seemed like ElevenLabs may have been using a (much faster at the time) version of TorToiSe TTS, given the output is so similar.

According to the linked Github page, they seem to have solved the speed issues now, so it might be worth looking into. Of course, the other commenters have provided solutions that are pre-integrated into the LLM, but if you’re just looking for TTS this could be worth checking out. Also worth noting that this requires an NVIDIA GPU.

Some people seem to be more concerned with this study “feeling” correct more than it actually being verifiably correct.

Was going to say this same thing to back you up. We can’t both defend this “obvious” study by saying “it’s good to have data to back it up!” And then simultaneously argue against having data because it’s “too obvious”.

I completely agree, a study like this is as good as worthless without disclosing the list of words, or the methodology used for testing words (if they are stored in a latent space rather than a list, for example).