I used it once, as a last resort when I wanted to try some program that had a ridiculous set of build dependencies that was just too much. It was okay, I guess.

int is_even(int n)
{
    int result = -1;
    char number[8]; //should be enough
    sprintf(number, "%d", n);

    // check the number
    // TODO: handle negative numbers
    for (char *p=number; *p; p++)
    {
        if (*p=='0' || *p=='2' || *p=='4' || *p=='6' || *p=='8')
            result = 1;
        else if (*p=='1' || *p=='3' || *p=='5' || *p=='7' || *p=='9')
            result = 0;
        else
           sprintf(stderr, "Your number is wrong!\n");
           exit(1); 
    }
    return result;
}

If you really want it right now, many guides for how to compile linux kernels are available. Here’s one.

I have two reactions: 1. The headline is rather silly. 2. There’s no way this little script, although it might conceivably be useful to someone, needs to be a youtube video.

Well okay, since it’s up to me: Let’s have free software. Fully free Linux on every phone, including all “firmware” which has gotten awfully soft lately. No more proprietary driver blobs for ethernet controllers or cellular modems. No more proprietary DRM modules. No more “smart” consumer goods that come without source code. The free software revolution has gone pretty well in some respects, but we need to finish the job and put an end to all that garbage.

XFCE works for me, but I’ve heard that LXDE is pretty good too.

the packagers had not changed it as they were asked to do

Were they really? Or were they told "change it if you don't like it"? Genuine question, and it would make some difference.

But in either case I'm sure not all of them did, and failing that it is all down to the one person (or worse, one team of people) administering the system. Badly configured networks resulting in DNS problems is not exactly rare, but that is beside the point. It's clearly wrong no matter how uncommon is the situation that makes it materially detrimental.

It's just one more annoying little thing to go on the big list of items to be corrected when setting up a systemd-equipped system, but more importantly believing that it's acceptable to just leave it there demonstrates extremely poor judgement to a degree that makes many of us doubt the trustworthiness of the entire project. Perhaps in 2013, or whenever the decision was initially made, substantial numbers of people were sufficiently clueless as to think that adding in the possibility of inadvertently having your system quietly direct all its DNS queries to Google was better than the more obvious alternative of not doing so, but after everything that's gone down since then it's quite hard to imagine why anyone would stick up for such a bizarre point of view today.

The main thing that turned it into a serious issue rather than just a stupid thing to joke about was that Poettering refused (as of five years ago) to admit that it was a mistake.

Remember when Google's DNS server address was hard-coded in systemd-resolved? Good times, what a laugh we all had.

monopolisation of the init system

That's the one thing about systemd that is sort of nice. We don't really need to have more than one init system, and it does a sufficiently comprehensive job of being one. If it were only an init system and nothing else, there basically wouldn't be any remaining complaints about it by now.

deleted by creator

MX

vastly expands the pool of potential victims

I'm not brave enough at the moment to say it isn't some kind of crime, but creating such images (as opposed to spamming them everywhere, using them for blackmail, or whatever) doesn't seem to be a crime that involves any victims.

Not sure if it's from an alternate universe or from our own future, but somewhere there is a version of this article that's like "Today, the market for Mastodon alternatives is a crowded one to say the least. There are numerous services for consumers to try, including the open-source based Misskey, smaller startups like Pleroma, plus the Elon Musk-based product formerly known as Twitter."

It may depend on how highly you value your software freedom and the benefits that come with it. Even if the performance per dollar for GPU tasks on blender was 25% worse, personally I would still go for the one with the free driver.

No matter how good it is, and I'm hoping for the best, it will definitely be over-hyped.

Well, that marks the first time I've seen anyone refer to it as "the apt store." Thanks, I hate it.

deleted by creator

13% may not sound like a lot, but it includes almost all of the 10% who weren't complete idiots.