I read it as "robot that can eat orgasms for fuel. My version is better.

Is this Martin Luther?

Share it with us please please please.

I am sceptical of how one would be able to decipher Japanese as a European language speaker, it is very foreign. Also, just because in some specific cases the dub is of a low quality does not mean that it is always inferior. In fact, all things being equal I would prefer the language I can understand even if it is not tge original language.

Howewer, I just watched “Mars Express” in french to see if I enjoy it, and it was kind of nice. The subtitles did not always translate what was said exactly from what I could gather, but I rather enjoy how the language sounds. I guess it makes sense to watch it in a specific language for the atmosphere.

But now I feel stupid for not knowing french. Will have to start learning it I guess.

What’s the point of original audio, if you can’t understand it?

I prefer it as well, when I can understand the language.

I believe this might have been an instance of so-called “flirting”.

If you don’t speak Japanese, why would you watch anime in Japanese? Do you watch all films you do not know the original languages of with subtitles?

The first one is hotter.

How else would you describe it?

What you described is the normal one. The american one does not have solid chocolate at all as I described.

I prefer the normal sized ones.

Or do you mean you will buy the american one?

If I remember correctly, they don’t even have chocolate in solid form, and the plastic egg splits into two halves, with one having the toy inside and the other some kind of white thing with two balls.

This is not really a kinder egg tbh, it is too different and loses the cool part about it which is the toy being inside the chocolate egg.

Yes, gods are different in different religions, but why would you, to determine whether something is a god in christianity use pagan standards?

My point is, that within the logic of christianity you can not say there is more than one god, it is unreasonable to say that christianity is polytheistic.

Also, “one divinity appearing in multiple forms” is not a polytheistic thing, since you only have one divinity. The trinity does not consist of three gods, but of three hypostases of the same god. My point is that it can only seem like those are three gods, but if you have more deep knowledge of christianity you will never say that.

Ok, I will concede to you that pop culture should be considered, however I would not say angels are gods.

The christian God is the supreme power, he is the monarch of the universe, so to speak, everything is under his authority. An angel is not a god, because he is a creature, not the creator, he is subordinate. He is not all-powerful, he is a servant. Within the logic of christianity there is absolute difference between god and everything else.

In greek paganism Zeus was the king of the gods. However, he was not allpowerful(there were some henoteistic tendencies, however), other gods were still powerful in their own right, and there were gods he was afraid of(in a famous passage from the Iliad that I do not quite remember, it is mentioned that he was afraid of Nyx). There was a revolution when Kronos was overthrown, as you mentioned. So those two religions are quite different.

In Jainism, the so called “gods” are a different thing altogether, no need to mention it.

I do not know much about mormons, aren’t they christians? I thought they were.

Google “theodicy”.

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/theodicies/

Well, the way Satan is depicted in pop culture has little to do with actual christianity, and I am not sure why you felt the need to include him, despite the fact he is a very minor character in christianity, and also even in the popular depiction he is not nearly on the same level, as he was created by God, is not omnipotent, omniscient, unlike God, etc.

The continuous US states are 8,080,460 square kilometres.

Europe is 10,186,000 square kilometres.

I am not sure if maths has reached north america yet, but saying that “Europe can fit in the continuous us states with room to spare” does not increase the percieved intelligence of the average american.

Europe is actually bigger than the entirety of the US, including alaska and overseas territories, but who cares about facts, right? If you can manufacture ridiculous reasons to feel better than others, who needs them?

In what world is that “not far off”?

Start smoking.

“all of Europe could fit inside the 48 continental states alone” - are you sure about that, fam?

Maybe if you had a clue about what is going on outside of your country you would want to leave it, but alas, you don’t.