Tap for explaining the joke
It doesn’t exist. The joke is that some people might not know that.
Moved from https://lemmy.world/u/fnrir
It doesn’t exist. The joke is that some people might not know that.


Aaaaand of course it’s Polskie Stronnictwo Lobbyingowe
autistic bread
good argument. unfortunately i don’t care
I’ve seen this before. Is this a translation?


AI - another indian





Yeah, I know. I didn’t notice. Sorry.


Shizuku?
EDIT: I didn’t notice it was mentioned already. XDD


Not for long :'(

Cool bug Fact is


Is the title the issue? Should I change it and to what?


The point is - GitHub has a spam issue. The perpetrators created multiple issues per minute, atting multiple users and added a misleading url to the issue content.
GitHub could have done something to prevent that.


I don’t get it either
Skill issue
- sincerely, someone making a DST crate
EDIT: To clarify…
There are some things that are only doable on nightly Rust (like specialization, const fn in traits, etc.) and the reason for that is to avoid future issues. In that regard, Rust will not be as good as C++… at least until those get stabilized.
Some of the nightly functionality (like
ptr_metadata) can be achieved withunsafecode and it’s fine to do that, as long as it’s only done when necessary and it’s properly documented.It’s okay to want to use C++, but that language has it’s own issues and footguns (virtual destructors, “move semantics”, C-style casts, header files and more) that Rust wants to avoid.
EDIT 2: Specialization is also kinda doable with deref coercion, but that’s another can of worms I don’t wanna open here.
EDIT 3: And if I had to mention some of Rust’s footguns:
unwrappanics, which isn’t bad in and of itself, but it’s short so you’ll probably want to use it instead of other error handling methods (see recent Cloudflare outages)unsafefunctions implicitly allows usingunsafeoperations (fixable by adding#! [deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)])