fallaciousBasis

Oh look Putin can fiction.

Said no one, not a single Canuck.

A cock-meat sandwich. Extra cock.

Found the evolution denialist.

Enjoy that young Earth creation, fam.

Lulz

I’m not a supremacist of any kind and I’m not trolling. You obviously just need to learn to read and comprehend what you’re actually reading.

I can explain things to you. I can’t understand them for you!

Cool. Tell me more about stuff you know nothing about. /S

You say colonialism I say darwinism.

You say racist angry antisemitic crap. Then project it. Hilarious.

I didn’t implicate that all Jews are Zionists. In fact, I explicitly said the opposite!

Again. Zionism isn’t monolithic and some Jews and Israelis are anti-Zionist. So that accusation doesn’t really land.

On the “white colonial ideology” point: the demographics don’t support that framing as a universal description. A large share of Jewish citizens are of Middle Eastern and North African descent (Mizrahi/Sephardi), many of whose families were expelled or fled from surrounding countries in the 20th century.

Calling the entire population “white European colonists” erases that history.

It’s also not accurate to say Zionism inherently means removing every non-Jew. There are forms of Zionism that envision a Jewish-majority state alongside full civil rights for minorities, and about 20% of Israeli citizens today are Arab. So that’s the reality.

You can oppose Israeli policies or nationalist models without redefining the ideology into its most extreme version and treating that as the only one.

On the two-state comparison to reservations… that analogy assumes one side would have total dominance over the other in perpetuity. Whether someone supports or opposes two states, the proposal in international diplomacy has generally been two sovereign states, not a reservation system.

You can argue it’s unworkable, but it’s not historically accurate to say it “originates” from U.S. reservations.

If the argument is that nationalism tied to ethnicity or religion is morally wrong, that’s a coherent position, and I agree, but then the critique should be applied consistently to many nation-states around the world, not uniquely framed around Jews or “Zionists.”

And again I’m using quotations around “Zionist” cuz that’s the term you originally used. But that’s not what you really mean. We all know what you really mean and has nothing to do with quote-unquote “Zionism.”

You played it all pretty clear, “death to white jews.” Right? Because I have very good reading comprehension. And that’s exactly what you’re supporting.

So saying “don’t confuse Zionism with Judaism” is correct, but only whenwe also acknowledge that Zionism itself isn’t monolithic and doesn’t map perfectly onto any single religious or political identity.

Some Zionists will support a two-state solution, others might support a Jewish-nation-state and others a more secular(culturally Jewish) nation. Some Israelis and Jews are anti-Zionist. And some people are zionists while abhoring what’s happening in Palestine and don’t hesitate to sharply condemn Israel’s actions.

But I used it in quotes for that very reason. Some people bitching and whining about Zionists seem rather antisemitic. That was the point. Anti-zionism, for some, is just antisemitism with a new label.

Why does it seem like every genocide on Earth has to do with at least one of the abrahamic religions, when not two or even all three?

But yea… “Zionists.” Let’s pick the abrahamic religion with the fewest adherents and least blood of their hands, historically, and call them Nazis. Sure. Let’s ignore China, Myanmar, Sudan - let’s just call the whole of Northern Africa the Middle East moving into a southern Asian. And as far as I know every single-ass one of these has to do with mostly 1. Muslims and then 2. Christians and the least of these would be the Jews.

Thank God I’m an atheist.

Yea? Is it so much better than if coffee leaves I’m going to leave this shit hole existence? Worse?

Please educate us all in your quantifications and qualifications.

Good luck with that! Hopefully cancer. Cancer isn’t so bad, right?

No one gonna miss you. Bye Felicia.

Why?

Let them drink tea.

It’s Marilyn Monroe…

Transference of sexual assault.

Fserve territory.

Xdcc does the either end. Lots of bw, low storage.

“I’m selfish, impatient and a little insecure. I make mistakes, I am out of control and at times hard to handle. But if you can’t handle me at my worst, then you sure as hell don’t deserve me at my best.”

• America

You need a Claude for that.

I’m a mere Chad.

That’s what scripts are for.

Mostly not because of the violin. Just to be clear.