If you’re using LVM, ZFS, or Btrfs then you can use their features and tooling to migrate data from one disk to the other, assuming you’re able to connect both at the same time.
I’ve done this online with btrfs several times now and it’s quite painless, admittedly only for self hosted stuff.
Where we’re going you won’t need eyes.
I bought a refurbished SFF PC and put a PCIe NIC in it. Installed opnSense.
Cheap as chips. Supremely powerful.
Zebras probably took it the worst.
I’m not saying it was aliens, but it was aliens.
Shhh, don’t tell the SovCits.
“I’ve got a buddy who can do the gas and the 'leccy. Super cheap.”
Plural of genre. Still should have been singular “genre” though, unless there are multiple genera of these images.
I still double-check my CIDR’s/netmasks and expected ranges with a tool (some online one or other). Easier to avoid silly mistakes or typo’s
TL;DR: it depends entirely on the DHCP server software.
Generally the safe/reliable policy is to assign a smaller DHCP range (or ranges) and allocate static assignments outside of the DHCP range(s).
Assume your network is 192.168.1.0/24.
Specify 192.168.1.128/25 for DHCP, which means all DHCP addresses will be above 192.168.1.128.
This leaves you everything below 192.168.1.127 for static assignments.
Was it an official act as president?
Same boat, but I gave D4 a go. I’m enjoying it. YMMV.
I entirely understand being burnt by D3.
Plausible to within 1/5 of a plausibility unit.
“This jacket looks ridiculous”.
Guy walking in with hat: “Uhh…”
Why do all their jackets look three sizes too big?
Obviously they need room for all the medals, but they could at least tailor them.
It was literally the tag line for Windows 98 I think!
The gag was that it just (barely) works.
No-one who buys a PC with windows preinstalled gets any choice at all… and had the preinstalled malware cme with it.
Ali I see is a “pretty butterfly”
I trialled both a while ago, chose ummich asits face recognition was superior.
There were other reasons, but I’ve forgotten them.