Nominal typing was a premature optimization. Product types should be structural and row polymorphic. And if they had been, dynamically typed languages nevdr would’ve needed to exist and wouldn’t have waited so long to smuggle types back onto their data structures. That said, i’m kinda glad shell scripting languages exist.
I like how i feel about you using “mate” and “cent” in the same post. Nou, I hate it.
might you even say “two perspectives of the same object”?
Before reading the title i was like “wonder what happened to that kid?”. Lo and behold, mf is older than me and, on second glance, I prolly look older than Connery.
Tsoding calls it “software prostitution”
Expressiveness isn’t the problem. No doubt it can be less efficient and re-usable but constructed languages are mostly syntactical interfaces to subsets of the semantics we express in natural languages all the time. By using them we can precisely express combinations that can be difficult to convey in natural languages without losing time to perspecctive and interpretation but that can only a problem if you’re in a hurry. In most cases, it’d be far more limiting to have to express natural semantics in a constructed language than the other way around. What’s more is that all the orimitives of these languages are developed using the same strategies we use in natural languages. It’s just the morphs and structures that differ.
All fun and games until your bluff gets called
“Who’s there?”
“No solicitors”
“I’m full”
Neither
As with all things arch based: void better
The concern isn’t that corporations deserve protection. It’s that as thesr platforms gain notoriety, those corporations lash out and force them to cease operation, which is fundamentally inconvenient to pirates.
Can anybody break this one down for an idiot like me?
HTML/TeX/etc are real programming languages that just happen to be declarative as opposed to imperative.