It’s pretty effective when your attacker doesn’t want to harm innocents at any cost, at least. But most organizations going to war don’t care enough.

If my goal was to kill exclusively enemy combatants and leave all civilians alone, it would be pretty effective to round them up and gas them, yes. I’d rather do that than indiscriminate fire.

Animal abusers aren’t furries. Conflating them is unhealthy for both

Wow, deeply ironic that giphy took this gif down

I learned to drive in a town where the on ramp to the highway came out of a roundabout so I actually did some learning! :)

It’s not that Israel controls the US Gov’t - it’s that having them as an ally in the Middle East is so valuable that the government is willing to protect them even when they’re in the wrong

It depends on which lightning, to be fair. “Lightning Bolt” is 8d6 (it’s my current character’s favorite spell)

Yes. But at the time it was on the euphemism treadmill, it was. And that’s the point being made.

I think i recognize some context you’re missing.

I feel like this is in response to an unsolicited ERP request from the left chatter, making it essentially proportionate.

Now I can’t be certain but that is a common thing I’ve seen people do so it feels likely.

it’s no coincidence that the best pokemon games (emerald, platinum, and legends arceus) are the ones that don’t come with a paired-off other half

I'll give you half as salty as the sea. not full hog

objectively false

who was the guy on reddit who did this with literally every message? neoxus3- I think? it's genuinely hard to read

honestly my favorites are a healthy mix of both.

on the left we have Cryogonal, Dodrio, Zygarde and Whiscash.

on the right we have Gardevoir, Lopunny, Goodra and Delphox.

can you two just fuck already

but but they’re losing the increase in revenue! they’re making less more money than they could be! think of the derivative!!