True, however I have to assume that fuel tanks tend to be lower on the locomotives (and therefore nearer the tracks), so as long as the explosive is high enough energy to set off the fuel, it’ll do a lot of the work for you. As will momentum, because all the explosive has to do is damage the tracks and jostle the engine, and the length of cars behind will keep on moving, go of the rails, and slam into the fireball.
Or detonate the payload beneath a train to destroy both the train AND the track
Replace the T with Texas Instruments and I’m in
They fill the bung holes
…did they actually broadcast DCS footage this year???
And if so, is that better or worse than the usual (ArmA 3)?
Never forget the 1992 mathssacre.
But also, they build the guidance systems for hellfire missiles.
Don’t forget about good ol’ Texas Instruments
If there was any confidence this is a homegrown design, I’d agree. But in all likelihood, they’ve just reverse engineered and copied Intel architecture and claimed it’s their own.
How many “final stretches” of updates have they had now?
12nm out to sea, everything is legal!
Just remember, dilution is the solution to pollution
I mean, if you go further back than 1947/1948, didn't the Palestinians used to own Israel? Or do we want to go even further back, to about 1200 BCE?
You know, that take makes more sense if you replace “Ukrainian” with “Russian”. That’s how bad the projection is. An almost exact 180° from reality.
There are some commercial rolls I’ve seen in the US that seem to be a happy medium…the holder itself in the stall has a thin plastic rod for the TP to go on, and the rolls have a very small opening in the center (and no cardboard) to go on that rod.