Alt. Profile @Th4tGuyII

  • 0 Posts
  • 111 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2024

help-circle

  • The pardon was sought by her grandchildren, who have long fought to reduce her conviction because the repeated sexual, emotional and physical abuse Ellis endured was not considered during the trial or afterward, when she could have been granted a reprieve from the death penalty.

    “Justice has finally been done,” Laura Enston, a granddaughter, said in a statement. “This pardon does not undo what happened 71 years ago. It does not restore the lives that were broken — the children left behind, the years lost. But it says, formally and finally, that Ruth should not have been executed; that the justice system failed her. That acknowledgment matters profoundly to our family.”

    While from the outside this feels like little more than a token gesture, it at least seems to have brought closure to her surviving grandchildren - to have this failure by the justice system acknowledged and apologised for in a official and public capacity.















  • You’re calling it a concept, but biological sex isn’t a concept in the same way as gender is. We didn’t just make sexes up.

    There are very real physiological differences between those with XX chromosomes and XY.

    And while I do agree with you that we should be teaching a more spectral view of sex that acknowledges those who don’t fit into the normal XX and XY model…

    I simply cannot agree with the notion that our model of sex is medically useless because it doesn’t perfectly cover <1% of the population without caveats.

    And then calling biological sex a lie because you disagree on how we model it is plain anti-intellectual.




  • I have a feeling that the megacorporation’s AI generating false statements about smaller businesses that effectively drives customership away from them harms a lot more small businesses way more than AI-powered businesses being held to account for what their AI states as fact publically.

    (And that’s not even counting the harm Google’s AI summaries are already doing to small publishers by driving traffic away from the very websites its using as source material.)

    If a company doesn’t want the liability associated with a rogue agent making false statements, then I’ve got news for you - they don’t have to use AI. Literally nobody is forcing small private businesses to use AI for anything.

    And what @MyButSmellsBat@feddit.org has said is entirely true. Most small companies won’t have an AI, and those that do should still be held accountable for their AI’s public statements.