Rothe

Of course. They are gathering data from people who have never even had a meta account.

No, pretty sure the entirety of Trump does that.

Pretty funny with the “Even Trump said it was”, as if they are adding some sort of extra impeccable cited source, when what they are doing is literally just regurgitating precisely what Trump said in everything they write.

They are Trump supporters because they are even more stupid than Trump himself, which is a pretty mindboggling concept.

Lots of privileged Russians are hardcore drunks as well.

It wouldn’t necessarily take a sane democratic regime to end the war. A military dictator could just as well do that. It is not their project but very specifically Putin’s project, and a military dictator could use the military power expended in the war much better elsewhere.

Very probable. At this point it is solely his personal project. The Russians just comply with him because, well, that is what Russians do.

It seems to be a bad anti-semitic photoshop of this one: https://lemmy.world/comment/20678706.

There is a suspicious lack of wall carpets in that second picture.

Pre-agricultural humans did still have access to flour and milk though.

Never knew his name, but I remember that ghoulish face from a Jon Stewart Daily Show bit, which mentioned he served as a token “Democrat” talking head on Fox News.

Piefed was fine as well.

Not to mention in the sequel when they revealed who your big nemesis was, and I’m like “who are you?”. It was a good idea, but a faulty implementation.

Is it from Poundland?

Yeah, unfortunately even the fediverse suffers from a heavy dose of US defaultism.

Of course not, but I don’t think anybody suggested that.

Yes, but they both share fond memories of racism and other forms of bigotry.

Hypocrisy is baked into fascism, so unfortunately it has no effect to catch them in it.

It has been said some time ago that “conservatism” (aka fascism) “consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect”.

Because it is so much easier to do PR when you don’t have to cater to boring things like facts, but instead the lowest common denominator of very stupid people.

Indeed, it is not apocryphal, but canon. It is part of scripture and god’s word, regardless of who said it in the text.

it ought to be called a forgery

That is basically the entirety of the bible though.