• 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 27th, 2024

help-circle






  • I’m fine with being an asshole to you. I actually chose to, because I thought it was funny at the time. And now I think its funny how upset you’ve gotten over this.

    Not sure if you’ve forgotten but I already conceded you were right: you just wanted to have an honest conversation about something you think is cool, but I think its stupid and I decided it was fun to tell you that. You definitely have nobler intentions and all that, I just simply don’t care about your point.

    Also feel free to be hostile to me, I’ll be fine. I’m not sure what point you are trying to prove here besides “me good person, you bad person”.

    I’m not going to stop replying, because this is fun for me. Take that for whatever but you don’t have to reply if you dislike me so much.


  • Hey I’m just one guy who didn’t like your opinion, did I really ruin this whole topic for you? Was there no other replier who gave you the debate you were looking for?

    Seems to me like you think my opinion is just as stupid as I think yours is, let’s call it even? And for the record, we’ve both been hostile. At this point I’m only replying because this is interesting and I want to see what you say next.


  • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldAutomation
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think you might be projecting your own hostility there.

    And you are just hijacking the AI conversation to argue about what the word intelligence means. I thought you wanted to talk about AI thats why I originally replied. When I realized you just wanted to apparently correct the public about their use of your favorite word, I decided this wasnt worth it.

    Its sort of like you went to a bowling forum, and were very excited to discuss the mineral contents of the oil on the bowling lane, but got upset when noone cared to discuss with you because they just want to talk about bowling.



  • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldAutomation
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    All you are saying is, is that intelligence isnt as smart as we think, that human intelligence is actually pretty dumb. That doesnt change anything about the current situation even if thats true though.

    So we all agree its actually human level intelligence now, what then? Can we stop developing it and do something else now?








  • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlPiracy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    No worries, happens to me too!

    As an aside, at least for me, that first thought that pops into my head when I am trying to understand or interpret something, can be so silly and strange and outside the box, I will legitimately laugh at myself sometimes because of it.

    And if it makes you feel better, my first thought reading it was actual sailing too, but only for a moment as I added more context to it. Not sure why I would think of real sailing considering where we are posting but something in the way it was written lends to it.


  • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlPiracy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    The specific case here was the professor had a financial stake in new books being sold.

    I do agree updated editions with new information could be important, but again when theres a financial incentive to sell new books, the obvious lean will be towards making new versions even if there is no new information.

    Since the books can be required, they should be required to show proof they have substantially added to their edition or else relegate it to a minor revision (maybe adding sub-editions like 1.0, 1.1, 1.2; where you only need the first number to be current). Right now its a whole lot of, “Trust us you need this book and the only pre-owned versions are out of date”.

    As a side thought, this is the kind of thing that makes me wonder if they use the book costs to weed out those that will not allow themselves to be abused to that degree. This would leave only those who would conform to their leader/manager/teacher and are less likely to try to change the system.