Listen man, if the phone doesn’t have a 3.5mm jack, IR Blaster, FM radio receiver, pop out rotating 6mp camera, micro SD slots, 2g compatibility, Native flash support and a physical keyboard that pops out like the fucking matrix, then it’s a complete piece of corporate shit and you’re a complete neo liberal bum bandit if you think otherwise…
Any USA company partaking in cyber attacks should be instantly sanctioned, assets seized and international arrest warrants issues for their CEOs. The only way to prevent pandora box from opening is to make examples of the companies that partake in this insanity. Don’t let America continue to get away with this shit.
Gish Gallop… if you’re going to start questioning whether the technique clearly demonstrated has validity, then you need to specifically state what your objections are, as opposed to vague statements. For emphasis, the demonstration isn’t on AI detecting, but rather AI watermarking. You wouldn’t use this tool to check if text was written by AI, but rather if the text was written by one singular LLM vs literally everything else.
I’m not sure we’ve read the same article. There are literally interactive demonstrations within the page to demonstrate how the concept works.
Given how placid the average democratic is, I’m pretty confident they will be given the chance.
I fucking hate everyone and would love to subject you fucks to 4g of pain taking off with a stupid catapult system. Nice math.
I thought the article explained that pretty reasonably on a scale of probability and weight. The longer the text, the more reliable the scoring.
Sell access to Turnitin and the likes for a small fortune. They are all but required to pay whatever the price is.
He 100% has no fucking clue what he is saying or doing from day to day and is being fed bullshit by people behind him. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain bullshit.
My guess would be almost all routinely updated Filterlists will continue to block Facebook ads, and probably even more relentlessly now.
Your illusion of privacy shouldn’t prevent an attempt to stop children being radicalised and accessing extreme content… it is having a profound impact on society. First generation ever recorded to be more right winged from the get go? Fuck that… Do you not see the type of country this will be in 20 years time if we don’t prevent kids accessing state level propaganda?
What the heck is your point exactly? We shouldn’t have mass surveillance? But we already do… Have you seen how many cameras there are? Do you know DWP can access your internet history if they suspect benefit fraud? No warrant required… And that’s one of dozens of government departments that can just whip up your internet history…
This isn’t some grand attempt at putting the final bit of the puzzle together… there are legitimately multiple generations of children who can’t read, accessing brain dead content that are turning into potatoes and becoming radicalised… Shall we just stop all attempts at preventing that because you’re worried about your privacy?
I know what you said, you said you would go torched earth if labour don’t drop the bill to protect kids from bad sites. You would vote for anyone else, which is essentially hanging the towel and letting reform win. First past the post and all that.
You’re under the impression we don’t already have massive surveillance? I know you know we do, the only difference is we don’t have any of the perks of it, such as stopping kids from accessing highly damaging content online.
I believe it is. The government capabilities of spying on its citizens doesn’t require it to have age verification lol… In any case, UK people can’t be spied on.
Age verification? What’s your point… voting for anyone else enables reform to get in which leads to America.
If you think using Linux, encryption, vpns and Lemmy makes you anonymous to any states or data brokers that want to identify you then you are naive at best.
I have not surrendered my anonymity, I recognised and accepted that in order to have it, a lot of bad things become possible, and the damage it causes… It’s just not worth.
That’s an entirely different subject though, my point remains. You are not anonymous to governments or data brokers. This bill won’t decrease your level of privacy, it will only make it more difficult for children to access social media, which currently is plagued with all sorts of harmful content. This bill is a net positive.
And my point is you have already lost the ability of privacy long ago…
Anonymous age verification? You are not anonymous on the internet to begin with. Even doing what you’ve suggested won’t reduce the ability for the government and even data brokers to identify you.
Donald is a baby that shits and vomits all over your car. You can get a detailer to clean up the mess, but it will never be the same again, and always have that faint smell of crap.
Then what is the problem with the bill? Everyone is up in arms about censorship and monitoring their identity but that already happens. This bill just means it’s harder for kids to access garbage sites? The capabilities to do all the things people think this bill will achieve already do exist in any case…
What does this article mean when the markets are bad, Trump always turns back? No he doesn’t, he just goes bankrupt…
Trump is going to bankrupt the world at this rate.