• 0 Posts
  • 39 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 15th, 2024

help-circle


  • There is one thing that is vital that is missing from peertube. Effective monetization.

    By watching on peertube I am a drain on resources. A net negative. I’d happily pay to offset those costs and more, but I want it to be shared amongst multiple creators and hosters.

    I don’t want to just support one, I want to support most of the network for the hosting and bandwidth, and a certain amount divided amongst the creators I watch.

    If PeerTube introduces some sort of payment / monetization solution, it might get more creators as well. Without it I can’t see it growing fast enough to compete with YouTube in the near future.

    Well… Sooner or later the costs of Full HD compressed video will be negligible for hosting and bandwidth, so that might be when YouTube gets a real challenge. So I guess we’ll see



  • We need some sort of “immune system” to handle these extremes, deplatforming is kinda like moving the disease to another part of the body where there is no “immune system”. Defederating might create the same effect.

    I don’t know how to handle it, but we might need more “normal” average people participating in a compassionate understanding way, with those that have lost their way. Because right now there are plenty of Russian bots that encourage the wildest conspiracies and world views, but also plenty of people with idle time on their hands encouraging it also.

    We will meet this challenge more and more as the fediverse grows. At this moment it’s not worth the investment to spread misinformation probably.





  • Hmm…

    So your argument is that we potentially lose valuable insight?

    I agree in principle, but it is hard to balance.

    Because without a certain amount of civility we potentially lose the voice of minorities and oppressed groups of people.

    In a free democratic country you of course should be legally allowed to be abrasive and say mean hurtful things.

    How would you balance/solve this dilemma on a social network? The same way as the law?

    I am a bit torn here










  • Excuse me? I am very offended by your insinuations here. It honestly makes me not want to share my thought and opinions at all. I am not in any way interested in this kind of content.

    I encourage you to read my other posts in the different threads here and see. I am not an apologist, and do not condone it either.

    I do genuinely believe AI can generate content it is not trained on, that’s why I claimed it can generate illegal content without a victim. Because it can combine stuff from things it is trained on and end up with something original.

    I am interested in learning and discussing the consequences of an emerging and novel technology on society. This is a part of that. Even if it is uncomfortable to discuss.

    You made me wish I didn’t…



  • I see the issue with how much of a crime is enough for it to be okay, and the gray area. I can’t make that call either, but I kinda disagree with the black and white conclusion. I don’t need something to be perfectly ethical, few things are. I do however want to act in a ethical manner, and strive to be better.

    Where do you draw the line? It sounds like you mean no AI can be used in any cases, unless all the material has been carefully vetted?

    I highly doubt there isn’t illegal content in most AI models of any size by big tech.

    I am not sure where I draw the line, but I do want to use AI services, but not for porn though.