accused of repeat copyright infringements

Does this court determine whether this concrete accusation against a person holds as well, or does this court determine whether an accusation is enough?

Is that the conclusion? I thought that’s still under investigation. I remember reading about it months after the first reports.

It’s sad how huge companies are basically their CEO. CEO makes decisions and talks - that’s the company. Even if the hundreds and thousands of workers below them [largely] disagree and would do differently.

Linking with a timestamp to the end of the video (no more honking) is quite the comedic turnaround

Exactly, one of the ways. And it’s a bandaid that doesn’t work very well. Because it’s probabalistic word association without direct association to intention, variance, or concrete prompts.

They link to it in the article, but for visibility, the resignation of Japanese SUMO community lead, contributor of 20 years. They voice their concrete issues.

deleted by creator

Until they fake author or print dates.

Google’s fault. Their prevalence and search ranking decisions.

edit: I dropped the"entirely" from “Google’s fault” because I guess it’s a decision by the platforms and without too, even if the alternative means less to no discoverability on Google.

unhanded error

underhanded error /s

It’s called clip because it stays. /s

Don’t be so serious 🤡

o7

It’s for the last sentence, “and no one would ever misunderstand a joke online again”. Not the whole article.

I mean… Just don’t use Google services!?

What kind of guide or in depth are you looking for? It’s a broad field. Google covers a lot.

Google extended their Smart features with AI. It can be disabled in the settings, presumably if you haven’t already.

I visited Gmail earlier today, and it gave me onboarding with information and the choice of enabling or not. I’m in the EU, dunno if that makes a difference.

I opened GMail and it specifically asked me to give consent in a descriptive/onboarding popover. Declining was choosing one of the two options. I’m in EU, it may be different elsewhere (title and article about US?).

webm is a container, not a codec

Even if you hit that blocker, you can still software-decode with [alternative] software.

Good thing finishing your coffee is many sips. Because Copilot certainly doesn’t feel fast. It often feels so slow you wonder whether waiting is worth it.

They did say why they’re doing it

Whenever possible have somebody else write the unit tests, so they don’t have the same assumptions and blind spots.

Did that not make sense to you?

I usually wouldn’t do that, because it’s a bigger investment. But it certainly makes logical sense to me and is something teams can weigh and decide on.