Or kill it completely. The only reason I’ve held off signing this is that the wording is so vague that it could work in favor of gaming companies. I’d rather not see that.
Or kill it completely. The only reason I’ve held off signing this is that the wording is so vague that it could work in favor of gaming companies. I’d rather not see that.
It’s a web app wrapped in Tauri. So basically a desktop app, but the web app can be hosted too.
Seems to have the same effect to me, very weird.
Normally I tend to skim text pretty quickly, skipping words, but this makes my focus snap back to read every word, very funky feeling.
Bullet hell requires the player to dodge a shit-ton of projectiles to survive.
Vampire Survivors does not have that element, so it’s not a bullet hell.
This genre is sometimes called a reverse bullet hell or bullet heaven.
Kapsalon superiority
You forget 11. Shoot me, Daddy Musk
While this would be great for those “online needed to play” games, wouldn’t this also lead to companies preferring subscription models?
I’d assume it’s easier to not include multiplayer in the “base” game and just charge a monthly subscription for the online part. Now the proposed law wouldn’t apply, since the customer only paid for the base game.
It’s pretty obvious what the intention of the writers of the proposal is, but I feel like it could have an opposite effect and push even more to the “games as a service” model those greedy publishers so desperately want.
I dunno, he’s not denying it!
It also raises red flags about what they (hopefully don’t) have in mind for the future
So trying to hack hackthebox is not permitted? Confusion is the name of the game
I’m amazed that for exactly this product they have not announced Copilot integration (yet)
I use syncthing, which works great unless you need a ton of space.
By your logic they shouldn’t be broken because it’s the competitors’ fault if people don’t do business with them instead.
Yes exactly, that’s why they shouldn’t be broken.
They’re consumer friendly and are not taking specific action to BE a monopoly, contrary to many other companies.
There’s also enough competition and it’s exactly their fault that they fail/refuse to implement what makes Steam so popular.
I’m definitely against monopolies, but mindlessly slapping rules on them just because they’re labeled monopolies is some of the dumbest shit I’ve heard
I think they’re down voting because, no, the singularity is not approaching at blistering speed.
Old railway lines in Europe often aren’t complete anymore and only cover relatively small distances.
There simply isn’t enough infrastructure to handle a full train network and fixing them up would probably require existing infrastructure and buildings to be disowned and destroyed.
The wheel is just there during the testing phase as a backup, seems the final pods don’t have it, as it would make the idea useless.
Copyright
As the article states, it’s Genshin Impact
Love it.
I’ve been willing to learn more about programming with location/map data so definitely checking this out.
Are you looking for contributions or help on anything? I think I might at least look at providing a Dutch translation for the front-end if you’re accepting PRs.
Multiple ways.
Companies can completely erase the idea of ownership. If everything is subscription-based, they can simply stop the subscription and have no further obligations.
Or Europe just gets completely locked out of functionality, as already happens in some European countries.
Of course good things can come from this, but I’ve read here several times that this just isn’t a good proposition and might just lead to the anti-consumer practices disappearing in a negative way too.