
When air is warm, it rises. As the air attaches to the blades, the air is tricked into accepting a new definition of “up” which rotates with the blades, endlessly propelling them.
As that air cools, warmer air is drawn in and entrapped, continuing the cycle.





(sexism, ableism, complete delusion, I’ve gone insane reading this website…)
I know nothing about the history and politics of Debian, but the stuff this guy is saying is bizzare.
Timeline starts with the publication of Orwell’s Animal Farm. This is going to be good…
He seems to interpret people’s personal lives as caused by Debian - talking about Joel Espy Klecker’s death, he makes it sound like the Evil Debians were chaining him to a rock and forcing him to write software, even describing it as “modern slavery” - does he think that people wih chronic illnesses shouldn’t contribute to free software?? Unless someone was actually coercing Klecker (which would obviously be bad), it seems like he was just choosing to contribute… Pocock asks if it’s fair that Klecker received no compensation despite companies that use Debian making lots of money. That’s how free software works…
Daniel Pocock refers to Daniel Pocock in the third person a lot, which makes it less obvious that this is his firsthand account and not someone else’s documenting of the story.
“The Debian Pregnancy Cluster” (???)
Claiming that women are only participating in Debian because of their male partners. Followed by a mention of a woman who met their husband through Debian (so was presumably involved in it independently before that).
Spends a lot of time listing people who died, even if their death is unrelated to their Debian participation. There’s even a graphic of people holding knives at the bottom, as if to imply that Debian is murdering people??
Quote “wheelchair fascism” - I am just going to provide this quote in full: “Bücherratten is demonstrating a certain amount of passive-aggressive behavior, wheeling herself up to the FSFE table at CCC, putting on the brakes and using her wheelchair to become the center of attention even before she speaks.” What the hell? I have no words here… What does this person expect? They’ve just described someone using a wheelchair to go up to a table in a normal way. They don’t elaborate on becoming the center of attention. This is equivalent to describing an ambulatory person’s “passive aggressive behavior, walking up to the FSFE table at CCC, putting their feet on the floor, and using their legs to become the center of attention” (https://danielpocock.com/en/fosdem-nazi-pass-fsfe-wheelchair-fascism-facts/)