The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
I know nothing about you or your situation, but food allergies can really mess up your life, and they’re often overlooked (speaking from experience).
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
I know nothing about you or your situation, but food allergies can really mess up your life, and they’re often overlooked (speaking from experience).
It was Celiac for me… It’s such a relief to be able to make a change and do something about it instead of “just getting on with it.”
Procrastination-productivity is a beast.
That’s exactly why I came to Lemmy: different trash.
Pretty sure it’s poured resin or the like…
I used to do drugs. I mean, I still do them, but I used to do them too.
Yes, I think if we can get an LLM to work while providing high quality, real world sources it will be a game changing technology across domains. As it stands though, it’s like believing a magician really does magic. The tricks they employ are incredibly useful in a magic show, but if you expect them to really cast a fireball in your defense, you’ll be sorely mistaken.
Did you read mine? If you wanted a depiction of a city, it’s more than good enough. In fact it’s amazing what it can do in that respect. My point is: it gets major details wrong in a way that feels right. That’s where the danger lies.
If your GPS consistently brought you to the wrong place, but you thought it was the right place, do you not think that might be a problem? No matter how many people found it useful, it could be dangerously wrong in some cases.
My worry is precisely because people find it so useful to “look things up”, paired with the fact that it has a tendency to wildly construct ‘information’ that feels true. It’s a real, serious problem that people need to understand when using it like that.
It’s like searching for a picture of Prague, seeing a drawing of Delhi, and then concluding you’ve been there. It’s not about laziness. It’s about accuracy.
Ironically, this post has some serious “Checkmate, Atheists” energy.
I’m not sure blasting adhoc justifications for what you feel is really philosophy, but if that’s what we’re doing… My mistake. Philosophy then. So tell me, Socrates, what is a human right?
Deep in that American politique, eh?
I mean healthcare is definitely a human right, but there is always more we could be doing. That’s a kind of arbitrary distinction that I don’t think adds anything to the discussion here.
Basic human needs are basic human rights. I really do think it’s as simple as that.
The text OP provided explains that. It’s a percentage of total linux users, not a percentage of computer users in that country.
There’s a photo editing software called gimp that is FOSS. Google gimp suits for more info.
Somehow both the most and least scary thing on the list…