D61 [any]

Nu-Mad Max 3: Boomers doing the War Boyz “witness me” bit with riding lawnmowers, weed eaters, and mayonaise.

riding lawnmower comes screaming out of the garage at its max speed of 5 mph, the driver dual wielding leaf blowers

See that parachute over there folks? Its rigged! Rigged I tell ya. Don’t trust it. If I jump out of a plane with that 'chute on and fall to the ground, to my untimely demise, it would be because it was rigged.

Hah!

Wonder if there will be some Democratic attempt to do a reverse “Purple Heart Band-aid” thing with this?

Wearing tampons as earrings or something.

Not sure why everybody needs a copy of my, I mean, somebody’s porn passport.

Mostly because I’m not the most competent techie, I’ve been using VLC between my PC and iPhone, for moving “books” around on devices that are very out of date.

make a backup

Pffftt… coward.

/s

Lower supply with a stable demand means an increase in profits. Doesn’t matter what decreases the supply. I tell you what.

Fair… I’m pretty sure I was being needlessly evasive/pedantic.

Not everything in a contract would be allowed to be enforced by law… so no.

Try writing a contract that includes voluntary cannibalism, let it get out to the public, and see if the police just let that slide.

No happiness… just material needs.

Sure there’s words there but are they actually legally actionable? Like something in an EULA that says, we reserve the right to delete this from your hardware if you don’t sent us a cookie every six months. Its there… but it doesn’t matter.

Abuse maybe, but illegal? No.

Its kinda like sending a “cease and desist” letter with a lawyer’s letterhead (usually an empty threat) but with the automoderation system in place about copyrighted works it winds up being up to the person defending themself from the claim to do the work to prove fair use instead of the person making the claim of infringement.

A man makes blankets and he “works in textiles” a woman makes blankets and she “has a hobby making quilts”.

x.com/ufo

Found a copy of Transformers: Devastation.

Its a freaking blast.

I don’t think its that complex. Group A gave permission for Group C to move into Group B’s place. Group C decided to get a bunch of Group N’s support to start the liquidation of Group B.

Decades of Group B, playing to the “Rules Based Order” crowd resulting in no end to the violence Group C was doing to Group B resulted in Group B being more and more okay with countering violence with armed resistance.

Here we are.

Would removing anonymity from email reduce or remove this threat? If business blocked all uncertified email senders, would this threat be gone?

So as a goober that keeps getting jobs where my employer mandates that I am assigned an email address from their private email system, is told to “practice cyber security awareness” blah blah blah, and then is immediately spammed by internal emails with a shit ton of links (from people who are strangers to me but actually work for the same employer) from inside the org, I don’t think removing anonymity would eliminate the threat. I’m being habituated into opening, reading, and encouraged to click links from “strangers” by my employer.

It might make it easier to for an attacker to ID a target though.

Back in my day we’d just huff the gas fumes while we were filling up the car.