• MrVilliam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      I can’t wait for the people who are obsessed with “wokeness” to find new substitute words to describe their intolerance. They’ve been using “woke” for an embarrassingly long time and they still haven’t bothered to agree on an actual definition.

      • WoodlandAlliance@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s better to have no definition. That way whichever minority I hate the most and whichever one you hate the most don’t need to be the same. We can just say woke.

    • Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      …how? Because Peach wears pants? That’s only thing that comes to mind .-.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Maybe because Peach wasn’t a simpering little thing with no agency who needed someone to clean up her whoopsies?

    • onlooker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Damn right it was! “Trust the fungus” my ass. I trust the fungus as far as I can throw it and I have toothpick arms. What’s next? Giving fungus voting rights? Legalising fungus marriage? Wake up, sheeple, they are taking you for a ride!

      In all seriousness though, are we labeling just everything as “woke” now?