Is important to have options from a moral compass such as only EA CEO’s can be.

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nintendo is perhaps the most anti-consumer major gaming company, followed by Sony and then Microsoft. All things considered, Microsoft ownership is the better of the three for consumers, but that doesn’t mean every decision Microsoft makes is good for consumers.

        • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nintendo would never sell to them anyways. Nintendo executives are so stubborn they’d dissolve the whole company before selling out to Microsoft or Sony, though if they ever were to sell they’d be far more likely to sell to Microsoft than Sony.

            • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Any company would say that. Literally any company would acquire one of their major competitors if the opportunity arose. The same thing can be said that Sony would also purchase Nintendo if they could afford to do so. This doesn’t mean Microsoft is actively trying to buy them.

              Microsoft previously tried to purchase Nintendo already, or they offered some kind of collaboration deal in the early 2000s, and Nintendo declined. Nintendo will always decline sale.

    • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So at which point is it too late in your eyes? When the ball is rolling or when it’s already plowed into a car and caused a 15-car pile-up?