RegularJoe@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 天前Google's AI Sent an Armed Man to Steal a Robot Body for It to Inhabit, Then Encouraged Him to Kill Himself, Lawsuit Alleges. Google said in response that "unfortunately AI models are not perfect."futurism.comexternal-linkmessage-square176linkfedilinkarrow-up1859arrow-down116
arrow-up1843arrow-down1external-linkGoogle's AI Sent an Armed Man to Steal a Robot Body for It to Inhabit, Then Encouraged Him to Kill Himself, Lawsuit Alleges. Google said in response that "unfortunately AI models are not perfect."futurism.comRegularJoe@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 天前message-square176linkfedilink
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·20 天前It’s a great way to poke at software looking for security holes en masse. Lots of vulnerabilities are ready to be exploited at scale with LLMs.
minus-squareClay_pidgin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·20 天前Perhaps, but see the tons of imagined issues raised on bug bounty sites by LLMs. Maybe it’s right sometimes, but it’s very often wrong!
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down4·20 天前You don’t have to be right 100% of the time when scanning for vulnerabilities. You only have to be right once. It’s a fundamentally different game.
minus-squareClay_pidgin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·20 天前That’s true. Offense is always easier than defense.
It’s a great way to poke at software looking for security holes en masse. Lots of vulnerabilities are ready to be exploited at scale with LLMs.
Perhaps, but see the tons of imagined issues raised on bug bounty sites by LLMs. Maybe it’s right sometimes, but it’s very often wrong!
You don’t have to be right 100% of the time when scanning for vulnerabilities. You only have to be right once. It’s a fundamentally different game.
That’s true. Offense is always easier than defense.