• verysoft@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Both are valid, I don't know why people want low framerates when we can have silky smooth ones.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is not like we want low framerates, it is just that we don't want to pay for the hardware to run those when regular framerate is more than enough.

      60 fps is plenty for every game genre. You only need more if you are a professional gamer, or can splash the cash because you play all night every night.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don't want to pay for the hardware either. I have an old 750 Ti, and you would be surprised how many (not new) games are running perfectly fine on it. Amount them those like the last deus ex games. I don't remember the framerate I had, but neither do I remember it as an unplayable laggy mess.

        When I read that CS2 barely manages to run on a 2060 or some other powerhouse (in my eyes at least, but honestly for some reason I have the impression that 20xx is not much of a leap from let's say a 1080 Ti) I can't think anything else but that the game is a totally wasteful garbage technically.

      • verysoft@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        60fps is not plenty. You have never used higher have you? Low-end hardware these days is ridiculously powerful compared to what it used to be. Don't let poor optimisation in games condition you to thinking otherwise, they could all be running a lot better.

        Anything with lots of camera panning is an objectively nicer experience at 120fps or higher.