imgflip devs should've known better. Just adding a img element on another img element won't do. You gotta generate them together and add only one img element where the watermark is edited into the image.
Too lazy to generate the appropriate image (with or without watermark) depending on users subscription status on the server side ig.
imgflip devs should've known better. Just adding a img element on another img element won't do. You gotta generate them together and add only one img element where the watermark is edited into the image. Too lazy to generate the appropriate image (with or without watermark) depending on users subscription status on the server side ig.
What percentage of people do you think care enough to remove it through the source code?
Less than 10%