Australia has enacted a world-first ban on social media for users aged under 16, causing millions of children and teenagers to lose access to their accounts.

Facebook, Instagram, Threads, X, YouTube, Snapchat, Reddit, Kick, Twitch and TikTok are expected to have taken steps from Wednesday to remove accounts held by users under 16 years of age in Australia, and prevent those teens from registering new accounts.

Platforms that do not comply risk fines of up to $49.5m.

There have been some teething problems with the ban’s implementation. Guardian Australia has received several reports of those under 16 passing the facial age assurance tests, but the government has flagged it is not expecting the ban will be perfect from day one.

All listed platforms apart from X had confirmed by Tuesday they would comply with the ban. The eSafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, said it had recently had a conversation with X about how it would comply, but the company had not communicated its policy to users.

Bluesky, an X alternative, announced on Tuesday it would also ban under-16s, despite eSafety assessing the platform as “low risk” due to its small user base of 50,000 in Australia.

Parents of children affected by the ban shared a spectrum of views on the policy. One parent told the Guardian their 15-year-old daughter was “very distressed” because “all her 14 to 15-year-old friends have been age verified as 18 by Snapchat”. Since she had been identified as under 16, they feared “her friends will keep using Snapchat to talk and organise social events and she will be left out”.

Others said the ban “can’t come quickly enough”. One parent said their daughter was “completely addicted” to social media and the ban “provides us with a support framework to keep her off these platforms”.

“The fact that teenagers occasionally find a way to have a drink doesn’t diminish the value of having a clear, ­national standard.”

Polling has consistently shown that two-thirds of voters support raising the minimum age for social media to 16. The opposition, including leader Sussan Ley, have recently voiced alarm about the ban, despite waving the legislation through parliament and the former Liberal leader Peter Dutton championing it.

The ban has garnered worldwide attention, with several nations indicating they will adopt a ban of their own, including Malaysia, Denmark and Norway. The European Union passed a resolution to adopt similar restrictions, while a spokesperson for the British government told Reuters it was “closely monitoring Australia’s approach to age restrictions”.

  • teslasaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They enforce laws that would punish the platforms if they dont abide by them. In what way are they not punishing the platform?

    There will be other platforms and kids that deserve to be able to communicate will figure it out.

    All i have to say about the ban is “fucking finally”. Cant wait for it to be enforced in Europe.

    • wondrous_strange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      50mil for a company like meta is chump change, and it is not proportional to being a teen in today’s world locked out of all main communication hubs.

      Youth are not the ones who need to ‘figure it out’. Massive companies, market leaders and decisions makers should, but they are all trash.

      Its a sensationalist solution that will surely backfire, it only address symptoms while ignoring the underlying many many problems.

      Very short sighted

      • teslasaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It is for the people to understand not to use such garbage, yes. If they cant figure it out, there is always text and phones.

        If it’s chump change, then why are they adhering to the new rules? There is something that you seem to have missed. You don’t seem to understand the manipulation that the social media companies are capable of, which is why rules are needed.

        • wondrous_strange@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          It is for the people to understand not to use such garbage, yes. If they cant figure it out, there is always text and phones.

          You contradict yourself. So the ban is not needed? You were saying it’s up to the youths to find alternatives.

          What I was saying that these platforms are toxic, they have a destructive affect on all, and we all deserve something better.

          A government ban never worked on anything and jts the stupidest and laziest of all options.

          • teslasaur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            If they cant figure out how to use other communication alternatives, they don’t deserve to use them. I can see how i fudged my words.