That's a way taller order than you might think. Docker has loads of kernel level integration that FreeBSD isn't interested in supporting, also there are separate techs for similar purposes, like jails.
The problem with podman is that we use stuff like Docker-compose and tilt at work, that require the docker daemon socket. I do try to use podman when possible, though. But yeah, I avoid Red Hat these days, that company is doomed.
I use kubernetes+containerd for my servers, which is neither Docker nor Podman.
When docker get their shit together and work on freebsd? Sure
That's a way taller order than you might think. Docker has loads of kernel level integration that FreeBSD isn't interested in supporting, also there are separate techs for similar purposes, like jails.
Yeah, so if projects don't support freebsd I'm out. Tired of everyone's fetish for docker, even Canonical have added freebsd style jails to ubuntu now
cgroups are very different and much more powerful than freebsd jails. The server world is leaving freebsd for Linux.
Docker still sucks, though, and you should use podman instead.
Son, just say no to IBM
The problem with podman is that we use stuff like Docker-compose and tilt at work, that require the docker daemon socket. I do try to use podman when possible, though. But yeah, I avoid Red Hat these days, that company is doomed.
I use kubernetes+containerd for my servers, which is neither Docker nor Podman.
Sounds more like a BSD problem and less like a Docker problem.
Podman to the rescue! Screw docker, podman is so much better and a quick google tells me there is a freebsd package of podman soooo