• MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That's not always the case because signing up and accepting a T&C makes it more binding of the user to say they are who they say they are. If they aren't, then it's close to fraud. Having just a "are you over" screen is not enough, since the user can easily lie and the company can get done for not having enough measures in place to stop that from happening.

    I know in the end it's all futile anyway because of many reasons. But for companies it's checking off a box that gets a governing body off their back and making sure they have the right certifications to do what they need/want to do.

    • Tankton@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Since when does a reddit account require me to submit ID proving I am indeed 18+? I literally see no difference in reliability between requiring an account where one claims to be 18+ and a banner where one has to claim to be 18+. In both scenario's you are relying 100% on user input.

      • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I didn't say they required you to supply id.

        Also the difference is in legislation, business certifications and responsibility.

        Like I also said, in the end these measures don't matter to end result of the user (other than now needing to make an account, but still able to lie through it) but they do matter when a company wants to work with another that require all of its partners to have specific certifications and whatnot.