• MicholasMouse@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Just want to hop in and also point out the vastly different costs of being wrong in each case.

    On one hand, we have a supervisor having to take a diversity course, and an employee getting a written warning about their performance. On the other hand, a person is losing their income and health insurance. If the evidence equally supported both sides and we had to guess, the detrimental effect of incorrectly supporting one side is vastly more significant than incorrectly supporting the other.

    And that assumes a hypothetical where the evidence doesn't support either side, something I do not think is the case. I think the article supplies enough information to support Alm's case.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      On one hand, we have a supervisor having to take a diversity course, and an employee getting a written warning about their performance. On the other hand, a person is losing their income and health insurance. If the evidence equally supported both sides and we had to guess, the detrimental effect of incorrectly supporting one side is vastly more significant than incorrectly supporting the other.

      Yes, but don't you get it? Someone might be getting called racist when they're not, and that's obviously the worst thing in the whole big wide world! And on top of that case, a black person will get to under perform in the workplace! Oh the humanity! Will no one think of the children?!?!?!

      • SugarApplePie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I for one am thankful we were born and raised in a society with no racial biases that could seep in to my work. Now, if you excuse me, I have to go back to writing up the only black person on my team for underperforming at the video game company with a history of racism and sexism B)