if you could pick a standard format for a purpose what would it be and why?

e.g. flac for lossless audio because…

(yes you can add new categories)

summary:

  1. photos .jxl
  2. open domain image data .exr
  3. videos .av1
  4. lossless audio .flac
  5. lossy audio .opus
  6. subtitles srt/ass
  7. fonts .otf
  8. container mkv (doesnt contain .jxl)
  9. plain text utf-8 (many also say markup but disagree on the implementation)
  10. documents .odt
  11. archive files (this one is causing a bloodbath so i picked randomly) .tar.zst
  12. configuration files toml
  13. typesetting typst
  14. interchange format .ora
  15. models .gltf / .glb
  16. daw session files .dawproject
  17. otdr measurement results .xml
  • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, although there's probably a culture or convention around that.

    Originally the idea was that it's a format which can contain fonts and other things so it will be rendered the same way on different devices even if those devices don't have those fonts installed. The only reason it's not commonly editable that I'm aware of is that it's a fairly arcane proprietary spec.

    Now we have the openspec odt which can embed all the things, so pdf editing just doesn't really seem to have any support.

    The established conventions around pdfs do kind of amaze me. Like contracts get emailed for printing & signing all the time. In many cases it would be trivial to edit the pdf and return your edited copy which the author is unlikely to ever read.

    • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hold on. I'm applying for a mortgage and I want the bank to pay off my loan for me after 6 months of payments.