I’m just tired. On the last post about having Linux at our work, many people that seems to be an IT worker said there have been several issues with Linux that was not easy to manipulate or control like they do with Windows, but I think they just are lazy to find out ways to provide this support. Because Google forces all their workers to use Linux, and they have pretty much control on their OS as any other Windows system.

Linux is a valid system that can be used for work, just as many other companies do.

So my point is, the excuse of “Linux is not ready for workplaces” could be just a lack of knowledge of the IT team and/or a lack of intention to provide to developers the right tools to work.

    • Cypher@lemmy.world
      10·
      1 year ago

      You linked the screenshot, defended the claim with whataboutism and then dissembled with this.

      Still, the “no virus” is not the only reason

      You could have simply said

      Yes the claim that Linux has “no viruses” is wrong but other points are still valid.

      Though I would seriously question any points made by someone claiming there’s no malicious software targeting Linux.

      • blkpws@lemmy.mlOP
        14·
        1 year ago

        “no virus” is because it’s literal extracted from the text, not my words. I explain then what I understand with saying “no virus”, as any device can have virus, JavaScript runs on Linux, Windows and Apple. It’s common sense. No need explanation.