Looking to migrate away from APS as it is no longer in active development.
I need a solution that will still enable me to add/remove/change passwords from an Android device, a Linux device, and have all changes sync-up. (In GNU-pass-based APS, it’s achieved by a git repo that saves passwords as gpg encrypted files) Preferably, I want it to still be self hosted, F-Droidable, and maybe a migration guide or tool to ease the transition.

Thanks!

  • just_another_person@lemmy.worldEnglish
    312·
    10 days ago

    Bitwarden for paid, or VaultWarden for self-hosted.

    I would say throw them some support and buy the cheap yearly pricing. It’s a steal, and you won’t have to worry about it ever.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.comEnglish
      21·
      9 days ago

      This is the way. I’ve used other methods like Keypass + Nextcloud, etc. A system built for this, like BitWarden, is soooo much better. Especially at things like 2FA secrets.

    • keyez@lemmy.worldEnglish
      24·
      10 days ago

      Or best of both worlds, self host Bitwarden directly for $20/year

          • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.comEnglish
            2·
            9 days ago

            Well yes, I run my own, as does everyone else questioning your response. The $20 is throwing everyone without context. We can only assume you mean hosting costs.

            • keyez@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1·
              9 days ago

              I was responding to a comment about bitwarden being paid while vaultwarden is self hosted. I’ve been self hosting bitwarden for years and pay $20 a year for the subscription to do so and support them. Is the self hosted option not paid like the comment I replied to says?

              • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.comEnglish
                3·
                8 days ago

                OK, there’s the context. “I self-host BitWarden and pay for an individual license to get extra features and support them.”

                All for that: Finance FOSS! That bring said, Comment OP didn’t say you couldn’t self-host BitWarden, but I understand the response now. Vaultwarden is just so much easier to self-host, though.

                • keyez@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  1·
                  8 days ago

                  The way it is written was like only vault warden is self host able and usually VW is mentioned more in forums when the actual official stack that gets regular updates and security reviews is available to host so I always like to point that out so more people use it instead of the knock off though it does have it’s use cases.