TikTok’s bid to overturn a law which would see it banned or sold in the US from early 2025 has been rejected.

The social media company had hoped a federal appeals court would agree with its argument that the law was unconstitutional because it represented a “staggering” impact on the free speech of its 170 million US users.

But the court upheld the law, which it said “was the culmination of extensive, bipartisan action by the Congress and by successive presidents”.

[…]

The court agreed the law was “carefully crafted to deal only with control by a foreign adversary, and it was part of a broader effort to counter a well-substantiated national security threat posed by the PRC (People’s Republic of China).”

  • tardigrada@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    17 days ago

    It helps to think before you type.

    The free market is free if and when you play by the same -democratic- rules. Look at Romania, just to name an actual example. Tiktok is much worse than Facebook and (most) others, and being worse is not an easy task here.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      17 days ago

      Tik Tok is not much worse than Facebook. The only reason is because Facebook cooperates with the US agencies, while they don’t get the information from Tik Tok. US does not like that citizen data is going to China instead being able to collect it themselves. From privacy standpoint of the end user, it does not matter who has the data; lost privacy is lost privacy.

      • tardigrada@beehaw.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        17 days ago

        I think Tiktok is much worse. It’s about a foreign country whose government is pursuing a dictatorial policy trying to interfere in foreign elections (again, look at Romania, for example).

        The argument of FB collaborating with the US gov is true I guess, but isn’t valid here. China is doing the same, the Chinese government is banning the Western version of Tiktok, too, let alone all other non-Chinese apps. So the ‘free market’-argument doesn’t make any sense here, it’d be even hypocritical.

        • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          17 days ago

          Because another countries takes away freedom and eliminates the free market, makes it a non argument if the US does the same? The US is doing the same what China does.

          • tardigrada@beehaw.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            @thingsiplay

            Because another countries takes away freedom and eliminates the free market, makes it a non argument if the US does the same? The US is doing the same what China does.

            If so, why then haven’t you long been criticizing China the same way you do now the US? Where are these posts?

            (Just to say that: The US, China, EU, and all the others can ban Tiktok, Twitter, FB, and all the centralized data collectors. I wouldn’t miss any of them, and I think it would be better for the world. But the hypocrisy here in this thread is very telling.)

            • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              17 days ago

              So you are saying I am hypocrisy, because you could not find posts in my history criticizing China? And that makes my critique about the US less true or acceptable? I no longer believe in good faith of your discussion here and will end discussing with you. You have the last word if you want.

            • LukeZaz@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              16 days ago

              I agree with you that “free market” standpoints aren’t very good places to criticize this decision from – except to point out the hypocrisy of the right-wing, which I do think the original comment was trying to do – but it has to be said that nobody is obligated to criticize both China and the U.S. equally in order to not be a hypocrite.

              One simple example of why would be that most if not all users here have absolutely no say at all as to what China does. There aren’t a lot of Chinese citizenry here. But there are a lot of Americans. It so follows that it makes sense to criticize the U.S. more, because many people on Beehaw can actually do something about it, especially in aggregate.

              It doesn’t help to criticize China much either, anyway. China’s bad, yes; we know. Even among honest-to-god capital-C Communist circles, China is controversial. Posts about it tend to do three things: 1) Create a sort of misery/anger circle-jerk, 2) arbitrarily and unnecessarily signal to others that you aren’t a tankie, when nobody should really need to clarify that in most scenarios, and 3) further U.S. propaganda interests by taking people’s time and attention away from issues they’re more likely to be able to do something about.

              I’m obviously not in favor of forgetting what China’s done, either, but there’s a happy middle-ground I think a lot of Western-centric sites sail right past, and I don’t think any of it is helpful.

              • tardigrada@beehaw.orgOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 days ago

                @LukeZaz

                There aren’t a lot of Chinese citizenry here. But there are a lot of Americans. It so follows that it makes sense to criticize the U.S. more, because many people on Beehaw can actually do something about it, especially in aggregate.

                I agree that there are most likely more Americans (or other ‘Westerners’) here than Chinese, yet there are many tankies here with alt accounts on Beehaw. It is them who spread the Chinese propaganda, criticizing the West in general while being silent on China.

                • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  I don’t think that is what was going on here, though. They were saying TikTok and Facebook are both equally bad. You may not agree, but at no point did they say it was a good thing that China gets your data. They said it is bad that both China and the US get your data.

        • kbal@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          17 days ago

          Yeah China sure is scary. Centralized social media owned by American billionaires on the other hand can totally be trusted never to interfere in elections.

    • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 days ago

      Except all the social media are doing the exact same thing. This is pointless political posturing

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Not quite. TikTok has been shown to tweak their algorithm against criticism of China. That’s the real reason for the concern. Their ability and willingness to try to purposefully manipulate people.

        • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          16 days ago

          Which is no different from any of the US social media companies tweaking their algorithms against criticism of all number of political things.

          Twitter blatantly forced right wing radical propaganda down their entire user bases through a for months. Facebook was selling user data to foreign influence groups to assist with political message targeting. They’re all the same.

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            Lots of people think the US social media platforms do that. But none of the scientific studies have been able to show it.
            The US companies are all purely driven by engagement, to maximize profit. The most effective source of that engagement, changes from person to person. But it’s most commonly what you might call “Rage Bait”.

            Twiter’s recent bend toward the right, is primarily self selection of it’s users. As the left… left… the platform, the pool of available content shifted right; Causing even more to leave. Unless you have some paper I haven’t seen.

            And Facebook selling data, is entirely different and unrelated. Nobody (no lawmakers) care about that.

            • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              16 days ago

              No, Twitter changed its algorithms leading up to the election. That was not self selection. They were actively pushing right wing bullshit down everyone’s throats because the owner spent $200 million trying to get the dipshit elected.

                • The_Sasswagon@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  I don’t think you’re going to find peer reviewed studies on something that happened a month ago, but I would be very sure to say someone is working on it.

                  But if you’ve used Twitter you can recognize when something changes. I haven’t used it for years, but secondhand I’ve heard it was pretty egregious. Obviously this could be due to external parties heightening a disinformation campaign, but I’m not sure that really matters.

                  American social media platforms creating an environment where propaganda and misinformation flourish and refusing to take action against it has the same net effect as TikTok altering internal algorithm. Arguing that somehow TikTok is worse because it’s a foreign government is nonsense when every social media platform is manipulated by foreign governments to the same effect.

                  Doesn’t help the US government just keeps saying “trust us bro, we have reports that say China is spying on us” while they threaten to ban one platform. Nobody trusts that, it looks like a witch hunt, and sounds racist when they single them out this way.

                  • Steve@communick.news
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    16 days ago

                    American social media platforms creating an environment where propaganda and misinformation flourish and refusing to take action against it has the same net effect as TikTok altering internal algorithm.

                    Targeted intent vs general apathy is a massive difference.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 days ago

      Dude, the US based social media platforms are no better than TikTok. Its all rotten to the core. X is a great example of this.